Scale and the origins of structural change

被引:71
作者
Buera, Francisco J. [1 ]
Kaboski, Joseph P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Econ, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Econ, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
Structural change; Efficient scale; Home production; Product cycles; INCOME-DISTRIBUTION; GROWTH; TRANSFORMATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2010.11.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider broad patterns of structural change: (i) sectoral reallocations, (ii) rich movements of productive activities between home and market, and (iii) an increase in establishment size, especially in manufacturing. We extend these facts and develop a unified model explaining them. The crucial distinction across manufacturing, services and home production is the scale of the productive unit. In manufacturing, scale technologies lead to industrialization and marketization. In services, they lead to marketization and later demarketization of services. A later increase in the scale of services could yield a decline in industry and a rise in services, consistent with the data. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 712
页数:29
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]  
Kuznets S., 1957, Economic Development and Cultural Change, V5, P1, DOI [10.1086/449740, DOI 10.1086/449740]
[22]  
Lagakos D., 2006, SUPERSTORES MOM POPS
[23]  
Lebergott S., 1996, CONSUMER EXPENDITURE
[25]  
MADDISON A, 1987, J ECON LIT, V25, P649
[26]   The rise of mass consumption societies [J].
Matsuyama, K .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2002, 110 (05) :1035-1070
[27]   A Ricardian model with a continuum of goods under nonhomothetic preferences: Demand complementarities, income distribution, and North-South trade [J].
Matsuyama, K .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 108 (06) :1093-1120
[28]  
Mokyr Joel., 2001, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, V55, P1
[29]  
Mokyr Joel., 1990, LEVER RICHES TECHNOL
[30]   INCOME-DISTRIBUTION, MARKET-SIZE, AND INDUSTRIALIZATION [J].
MURPHY, KM ;
SHLEIFER, A ;
VISHNY, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1989, 104 (03) :537-564