Predicting employee turnover from friendship networks

被引:75
作者
Feeley, Thomas Hugh [1 ]
Hwang, Jennie [1 ]
Barnett, George A. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Commun, Fac Member Commun & Family Med, Amherst, NY 14261 USA
关键词
turnover; centrality; networks; friendship; peer; social support;
D O I
10.1080/00909880701799790
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Employees (n = 40) at a fast-food restaurant were surveyed about characteristics of their position and their level of satisfaction. Employees were then asked to report with whom they regularly communicated inside and outside the workplace and to indicate how close they were to employees with whom they were linked. Employee turnover was measured after three months had elapsed. A goal of the research was to replicate a model of employee turnover that predicts employees more central in their social network to be less likely to leave, and to test a social support explanation of the centrality model. The results indicated that employees who reported a greater number of out-degree links with friends were less likely to leave. The number of in-degree links with friends did not significantly predict turnover, and neither did network links with peers. Friendship prestige, measured by the number of in-degree links, was strongly correlated with relational closeness and amount of time spent with employees outside the workplace.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 73
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]   CENTRALITY IN SOCIAL NETWORKS CONCEPTUAL CLARIFICATION [J].
FREEMAN, LC .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1979, 1 (03) :215-239
[22]   CENTRALITY IN SOCIAL NETWORKS .2. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS [J].
FREEMAN, LC ;
ROEDER, D ;
MULHOLLAND, RR .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1980, 2 (02) :119-141
[23]   The effects of network groups on minority employee turnover intentions [J].
Friedman, RA ;
Holtom, B .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 41 (04) :405-421
[24]   THE STRENGTH OF WEAK TIES [J].
GRANOVETTER, MS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1973, 78 (06) :1360-1380
[25]   SOCIAL CONTAGION AND MULTIPLEXITY - COMMUNICATION-NETWORKS AS PREDICTORS OF COMMITMENT AND ROLE AMBIGUITY [J].
HARTMAN, RL ;
JOHNSON, JD .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1989, 15 (04) :523-548
[26]  
Heider F., 1958, PSYCHOL INTERPERSONA, P322
[27]  
Hess JA, 2000, HUM COMMUN RES, V26, P458
[28]  
Jablin F.M., 2001, The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods, P732
[29]  
Jablin F.M., 1987, Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective, P679
[30]  
Johnson JT, 2000, J BUS IND MARK, V15, P399, DOI 10.1108/08858620010349493