The political economy of institutions and corruption in American states

被引:115
作者
Alt, JE [1 ]
Lassen, DD [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
corruption; Mancur Olson; political agency; political institutions; rent-seeking;
D O I
10.1177/0951692803015003006
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Theoretically, this article draws on political agency theory to formulate hypotheses. Empirically, it shows that political institutions have a role in explaining the prevalence of political corruption in American states. In the states, a set of democracies where the rule of law is relatively well established and the confounding effects of differing electoral systems and regimes are absent, institutional variables relating to the openness of the political system inhibit corruption. That is, other things equal, the extent to which aspiring politicians can enter and gain financial backing, and to which voters can focus their votes on policies and thereby hold incumbent politicians accountable for policy outcomes and find substitutes for them if dissatisfied with those outcomes, reduce corruption as a general problem of agency. These institutional effects are estimated in the presence of controls for variables representing other approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 365
页数:25
相关论文
共 61 条
[41]   ECONOMICS OF DIRECT LEGISLATION [J].
MATSUSAKA, JG .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1992, 107 (02) :541-571
[42]   CORRUPTION AND GROWTH [J].
MAURO, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (03) :681-712
[43]   I SEEN MY OPPORTUNITIES AND I TOOK EM - POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN THE AMERICAN STATES [J].
MEIER, KJ ;
HOLBROOK, TM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1992, 54 (01) :135-155
[44]  
Montinola GR, 2002, BRIT J POLIT SCI, V32, P147
[45]   EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS FOR REDUCING GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION - A GAME-THEORETIC ANALYSIS [J].
MYERSON, RB .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1993, 5 (01) :118-132
[46]   DICTATORSHIP, DEMOCRACY, AND DEVELOPMENT [J].
OLSON, M .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1993, 87 (03) :567-576
[47]  
OLSON M, 2001, POWER PROSPERITY
[48]  
Ostrom E, 1990, GOVERNING COMMONS EV, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
[49]  
Paldam Martin., 2002, European Journal of Political Economy, V18, P215, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00078-2
[50]   Separation of powers and political accountability [J].
Persson, T ;
Roland, G ;
Tabellini, G .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (04) :1163-1202