Quantifying and improving promotion effectiveness at CVS

被引:21
作者
Ailawadi, Kusurn L.
Harlarn, Bari A.
Cesar, Jacques
Trounce, David
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Tuck Sch, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] CVS Corp, Woonsocket, RI 02895 USA
[3] Mercer Management Consulting, London SW1X 7HJ, England
[4] Mercer Management Consulting, San Francisco, CA 94111 USA
关键词
promotion profitability; retail promotions; retail promotion impact;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.1060.0245
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We quantified the net unit and profit impact of each promotion offered in 2003 by CVS, a leading U.S. drug retail chain, and analyzed the key drivers of variation in this net impact. We used this analysis to identify the least effective promotions and conducted a controlled field test to demonstrate the impact of eliminating them before chainwide implementation. Our key findings are as follows. First, approximately 45% of the gross lift from promotions is incremental for CVS. Further, for every unit of gross lift, 0.16 unit of some other product is purchased elsewhere in the store. Still, more than 50% of promotions are not profitable because the lower promotional margin is not sufficiently offset by incremental units. Second, there is substantial variation in net profit impact across categories. Our field test shows that eliminating promotions chainwide in 15 of the worst performing categories will decrease sales by about $7.8 million but will improve profit by approximately $52.6 million. This is very impressive given that CVS front store sales in 2003 were approximately $9 billion while the net profit impact of promotions was -$25.3 million.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 575
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   AN IMPLEMENTED SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING PROMOTION PRODUCTIVITY USING STORE SCANNER DATA [J].
ABRAHAM, MM ;
LODISH, LM .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1993, 12 (03) :248-269
[2]   Promotion profitability for a retailer:: The role of promotion, brand, category, and store characteristics [J].
Ailawadi, Kusum L. ;
Harlam, Bari A. ;
Cesar, Jacques ;
Trounce, David .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2006, 43 (04) :518-535
[3]   The decomposition of promotional response: An empirical generalization [J].
Bell, DR ;
Chiang, JW ;
Padmanabhan, V .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (04) :504-526
[4]  
Blattberg RobertC., 1990, Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods, and Strategies
[5]  
*CANN ASS, 2000, TRAD PROM SPEND MERC
[6]   PromoCast™:: A new forecasting method for promotion planning [J].
Cooper, LG ;
Baron, P ;
Levy, W ;
Swisher, M ;
Gogos, P .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (03) :301-316
[7]   IMPACT OF SALES PROMOTIONS ON WHEN, WHAT, AND HOW MUCH TO BUY [J].
GUPTA, S .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1988, 25 (04) :342-355
[8]   The determinants of pre- and postpromotion dips in sales of frequently purchased goods [J].
Macé, S ;
Neslin, SA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2004, 41 (03) :339-350
[9]  
MCALISTER L, 1986, 162285 MIT
[10]   Promotional elasticities and category characteristics [J].
Narasimhan, C ;
Neslin, SA ;
Sen, SK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1996, 60 (02) :17-30