Content effects on decision making

被引:65
作者
Rettinger, DA [1 ]
Hastie, R
机构
[1] Middlebury Coll, Dept Psychol, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol, Ctr Res Judgement & Policy, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.2000.2948
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
How does the domain or subject matter of a decision problem affect the outcome of the decision? Although decision-making research typically dismisses content as merely a cover story, the present research shows that it plays a fundamental role in the decision process by influencing the information processing that underlies it. An experiment is reported in which the same basic decision problem was presented in several content domains (legal traffic tickets, academic course grades, stock investments, and casino gambling). The changes in content led to changes in both strategies and mental representations, which in turn led to changes in decision outcomes, even though measures of the subjective utilities of the options remained unchanged. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 359
页数:24
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]   EXPLANATION-BASED DECISION-MAKING - EFFECTS OF MEMORY STRUCTURE ON JUDGMENT [J].
PENNINGTON, N ;
HASTIE, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1988, 14 (03) :521-533
[22]   EXPLAINING THE EVIDENCE - TESTS OF THE STORY MODEL FOR JUROR DECISION-MAKING [J].
PENNINGTON, N ;
HASTIE, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (02) :189-206
[23]  
Pennington Nancy., 1991, CARDOZO LAW REV, V13, P519, DOI DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
[24]  
RETTINGER DA, IN PRESS EMERGING PE
[25]   CHOOSING VERSUS REJECTING - WHY SOME OPTIONS ARE BOTH BETTER AND WORSE THAN OTHERS [J].
SHAFIR, E .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1993, 21 (04) :546-556
[26]   CAUSAL THINKING AND THE REPRESENTATION OF NARRATIVE EVENTS [J].
TRABASSO, T ;
VANDENBROEK, P .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1985, 24 (05) :612-630