Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks

被引:159
作者
Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L. [1 ]
Majchrzak, Ann [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, McCombs Sch Business, Ctr Business Technol & Law, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
interorganizational collaboration; transactive memories; security management; ego-centered network;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1070.0315
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Current social cognition models of knowledge coordination based on transactive memory systems (TMS) theory have not generally considered conditions in which goals among partners are incongruent, and that those with specialized knowledge will not necessarily act to share their knowledge. As expected from previous literature, when facing a problem requiring inputs from others, an individual will draw on her personal or ego-centered network using the knowledge of her network's TMS; however, we theorize that the mixed motives within her network will cause the individual to also take into account her perception of the level of distrust within the network when combining the received knowledge from others in the network. Moreover, an individual's view of her network's TMS will be shaped not by pecific policies or enforcement mechanisms, but by semistructures for how knowledge is disseminated, owned, and discussed. Our theory is supported based on a survey of security professionals responding to national security threats. The findings encourage a reexamination of certain assumptions of TMS theory, as well as extending theories of ego-centered networks and social-cognitive information processing to include how individuals manage the knowledge-sharing/protection tension in interorganizational collaborations.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 276
页数:17
相关论文
共 85 条
[41]   Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise [J].
Jarvenpaa, SL ;
Staples, DS .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2001, 18 (01) :151-183
[42]  
JARVENPAA SL, 2006, BEST PAP P AC MAN C
[43]   Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration [J].
Kalman, ME ;
Monge, P ;
Fulk, J ;
Heino, R .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (02) :125-154
[44]   ESTIMATING THE SIZE OF PERSONAL NETWORKS [J].
KILLWORTH, PD ;
JOHNSEN, EC ;
BERNARD, HR ;
SHELLEY, GA ;
MCCARTY, C .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1990, 12 (04) :289-312
[45]   KNOWLEDGE OF THE FIRM, COMBINATIVE CAPABILITIES, AND THE REPLICATION OF TECHNOLOGY [J].
KOGUT, B ;
ZANDER, U .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (03) :383-397
[46]   Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context [J].
Korsgaard, MA ;
Brodt, SE ;
Whitener, EM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (02) :312-319
[47]  
Kramer R., 1999, SHARED COGNITION ORG, P163
[48]   Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions [J].
Kramer, RM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 50 :569-598
[49]  
Laumann E.O., 1966, PRESTIGE ASS URBAN C
[50]   The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer [J].
Levin, DZ ;
Cross, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 50 (11) :1477-1490