When do losses loom larger than gains?

被引:176
作者
Ariely, D [1 ]
Huber, J
Wertenbroch, K
机构
[1] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.42.2.134.62283
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In defining limits to loss aversion, Novemsky and Kahneman (2005) offer important new data and a needed summary of appropriate ways to think about loss aversion. In this comment to Novemsky and Kahneman's article, the authors consider the new empirical results that involve probabilistic buying and selling, suggesting caution in generalizing the results to nonprobabilistic commerce. The authors expand Novemsky and Kahneman's summary by exploring two critical constructs that help define the boundaries of loss aversion: emotional attachment and cognitive perspective. Emotional attachment alters loss aversion by moderating the degree to which parting with an item involves a loss, whereas shifts in cognitive perspective explain why items typically viewed as a loss are given more or less weight. The goal is to use these constructs to characterize more specifically contexts in which losses loom larger than gains and to suggest specific ways that research into loss aversion could evolve.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 138
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   EXPERIMENTAL TESTS OF THE ENDOWMENT EFFECT AND THE COASE THEOREM [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
KNETSCH, JL ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (06) :1325-1348
[12]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[13]  
LEBOEUF R, 2004, ALTERNATING SELVES C
[14]  
Lerner JS, 2004, PSYCHOL SCI, V15, P337, DOI 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x
[15]   The boundaries of loss aversion [J].
Novemsky, N ;
Kahneman, D .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (02) :119-128
[16]   Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment [J].
Pham, MT ;
Cohen, JB ;
Pracejus, JW ;
Hughes, GD .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (02) :167-188
[17]   Anchoring effects on consumers' willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept [J].
Simonson, I ;
Drolet, A .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (03) :681-690
[18]  
STIGLER GJ, 1977, AM ECON REV, V67, P76
[19]   The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects [J].
Strahilevitz, MA ;
Loewenstein, G .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1998, 25 (03) :276-289
[20]   Mental accounting and consumer choice [J].
Thaler, Richard H. .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2008, 27 (01) :15-25