Age, order of entry, strategic orientation, and organizational performance

被引:133
作者
Durand, R
Coeurderoy, R
机构
[1] EM Lyon, F-69132 Ecully, France
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00061-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper proposes an empirical test of several hypotheses linking age, order of entry, and strategic orientations to a firm's performance. Three strategies are defined: cost-leadership strategy, innovative differentiation, and marketing differentiation The aim is to show that the impact on performance of both age and each of the three strategic orientations may differ according to a firm's order of entry into an industry. Following Lieberman and Montgomery's (1998) evaluation of their major contribution on first mover advantage, we emphasize three points. First, we develop and lest hypotheses related to early and late followers' strategic orientations, broadening the scope of traditional studies on pioneers. Second, the model combines the dimensions of a firm's age, order of entry, and strategic orientations, as well as industry conditions (stage of the industry, environmental unpredictability, and technology diffusion), to establish a contingent model of performance analysis. Finally, the empirical study deals chiefly with organizational performance and not market share, which is considered a typical advantage accruing to pioneers. In addition, the scope of the study (582 French manufacturing firms) provides the means to fill a void in empirical studies because it is a broad cross-sectional test on non-U.S. data. The firms are mainly private, small to medium-sized, and single or dominant business firms. Therefore, our assumptions must be understood as particularly applicable to this type of firm.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 494
页数:24
相关论文
共 83 条
[71]   Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm [J].
Szulanski, G .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :27-43
[72]   ORDER OF ENTRY AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE - AN EMPIRICAL SYNTHESIS AND REEXAMINATION [J].
SZYMANSKI, DM ;
TROY, LC ;
BHARADWAJ, SG .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1995, 59 (04) :17-33
[73]  
Teece DJ, 1997, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V18, P509, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO
[74]  
2-Z
[76]   FINANCIAL INNOVATION AND 1ST-MOVER ADVANTAGES [J].
TUFANO, P .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1989, 25 (02) :213-240
[77]  
TULL DS, 1980, MARKETING RES MEASUR
[78]   MARKET SHARE REWARDS TO PIONEERING BRANDS - AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS AND STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS [J].
URBAN, GL ;
CARTER, T ;
GASKIN, S ;
MUCHA, Z .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1986, 32 (06) :645-659
[79]  
Utterback J. M., 1996, MASTERING DYNAMICS I
[80]   INNOVATION, COMPETITION, AND INDUSTRY STRUCTURE [J].
UTTERBACK, JM ;
SUAREZ, FF .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1993, 22 (01) :1-21