How Do General Practitioners and Patients Make Decisions About Cardiovascular Disease Risk?

被引:37
作者
Bonner, Carissa [1 ,2 ]
Jansen, Jesse [1 ,2 ]
McKinn, Shannon [1 ,2 ]
Irwig, Les [1 ]
Doust, Jenny [3 ]
Glasziou, Paul [3 ]
McCaffery, Kirsten [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, STEP, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Ctr Med Psychol & Evidence Based Decis Making CeM, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Southport, Qld 4229, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cardiovascular disease; decision making; prevention; primary care; risk appraisals; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PRIMARY-CARE; STRATEGIES; GUIDELINES; GAPS;
D O I
10.1037/hea0000122
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Although current guidelines around the world recommend using absolute risk (AR) thresholds to decide whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk should be managed with lifestyle or medication, the use of AR in clinical practice is limited. The aim of this study was to explore the factors that influence general practitioner (GP) and patient decision making about CVD risk management, including the role of risk perception. Methods: Qualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews with 25 GPs and 38 patients in Australia in 2011-2012. Transcribed audio-recordings were thematically coded and a Framework Analysis method was used. Results: GPs rarely mentioned AR thresholds but were influenced by their subjective perception of the patient's risk and motivation, and their own attitudes toward prevention, including concerns about medication side effects and the efficacy of lifestyle change. Patients were influenced by individual risk factors, their own motivation to change lifestyle, and attitudes toward medication: initially negative, but this improved if medication was more effective than lifestyle. High perceived risk led to medication being recommended by GPs and accepted by patients, but this was not necessarily based on AR. Patient perceptions of high risk also increased motivation to change lifestyle, particularly if they were resistant to the idea of taking medication. Conclusions: Perceived risk, motivation, and attitudes appeared to be more important than AR thresholds in this study. CVD risk management guidelines could be more useful if they include strategies to help GPs consider patients' risk perception, motivation, and attitudes as well as evidence-based recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 261
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   Communication-related behavior change techniques used in face-to-face lifestyle interventions in primary care: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Noordman, Janneke ;
van der Weijden, Trudy ;
van Dulmen, Sandra .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 89 (02) :227-244
[22]   The Treatment of cardiovascular Risk in Primary care using Electronic Decision suppOrt (TORPEDO) study: intervention development and protocol for a cluster randomised, controlled trial of an electronic decision support and quality improvement intervention in Australian primary healthcare [J].
Peiris, David ;
Usherwood, Tim ;
Panaretto, Katie ;
Harris, Mark ;
Hunt, Jenny ;
Patel, Bindu ;
Zwar, Nicholas ;
Redfern, Julie ;
MacMahon, Stephen ;
Colagiuri, Stephen ;
Hayman, Noel ;
Patel, Anushka .
BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (06)
[23]   Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines About Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Through Shared Decision Making [J].
Politi, Mary C. ;
Wolin, Kathleen Y. ;
Legare, France .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (06) :838-844
[24]   Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking [J].
Pound, P ;
Britten, N ;
Morgan, M ;
Yardley, L ;
Pope, C ;
Daker-White, G ;
Campbell, R .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (01) :133-155
[25]  
Ritchie J., 2003, A Guide for Social Science Students Researchers, P219
[26]   The Association of Patient-Physician Gender Concordance with Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Control and Treatment in Diabetes [J].
Schmittdiel, Julie A. ;
Traylor, Ana ;
Uratsu, Connie S. ;
Mangione, Carol M. ;
Ferrara, Assiamira ;
Subramanian, Usha .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2009, 18 (12) :2065-2070
[27]   Does Heightening Risk Appraisals Change People's Intentions and Behavior? A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies [J].
Sheeran, Paschal ;
Harris, Peter R. ;
Epton, Tracy .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2014, 140 (02) :511-543
[28]   Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature [J].
Sheridan, Stacey L. ;
Crespo, Eric .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (1)
[29]   The compatibility of prescribing guidelines and the doctor-patient partnership: a primary care mixed-methods study [J].
Solomon, Josie ;
Raynor, David K. ;
Knapp, Peter ;
Atkin, Karl .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (597) :e275-e281
[30]   Physicians' attitudes and adherence to use of risk scores for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: cross-sectional survey in three world regions [J].
Sposito, Andrei C. ;
Ramires, Jose A. F. ;
Jukema, J. Wouter ;
Molina, Juan Carlos ;
da Silva, Pedro Marques ;
Ghadanfar, Mathieu M. ;
Wilson, Peter W. F. .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2009, 25 (05) :1171-1178