A fuzzy group quality function deployment model for e-CRM framework assessment in agile manufacturing

被引:37
作者
Zandi, Faramak [2 ]
Tavana, Madjid [1 ]
机构
[1] La Salle Univ, Lindback Distinguished Chair Informat Syst, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[2] Alzahra Univ, Fac Engn & Technol, Tehran 1993891176, Iran
关键词
Electronic customer relationship management; Fuzzy quality function deployment; Agile manufacturing; Group fuzzy permutation; TOPSIS; Real options analysis; CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS; PERFORMANCE; SUPPORT; QFD; TECHNOLOGY; ENTERPRISE; SELECTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2011.02.004
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The rapid growth of the Internet and the expansion of electronic commerce applications in manufacturing have given rise to electronic customer relationship management (e-CRM) which enhances the overall customer satisfaction. However, when confronted by the range of e-CRM methods, manufacturing companies struggle to identify the one most appropriate to their needs. This paper presents a novel structured approach to evaluate and select the best agile e-CRM framework in a rapidly changing manufacturing environment. The e-CRM frameworks are evaluated with respect to their customer and financial oriented features to achieve manufacturing agility. Initially, the e-CRM frameworks are prioritized according to their financial oriented characteristics using a fuzzy group real options analysis (ROA) model. Next, the e-CRM frameworks are ranked according to their customer oriented characteristics using a hybrid fuzzy group permutation and a four-phase fuzzy quality function deployment (QFD) model with respect to three main perspectives of agile manufacturing (i.e., strategic, operational and functional agilities). Finally, the best agile e-CRM framework is selected using a technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) model. We also present a case study to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach and exhibit the efficacy of the procedures and algorithms. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 91 条
[61]  
Nieminen P., 2006, International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, V3, P181, DOI 10.1504/IJMED.2006.008249
[62]  
O'Leary C., 2004, European Journal of Marketing, V38, P338
[63]  
Plonka FE, 1997, HUM FACTOR ERGON MAN, V7, P11, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6564(199724)7:1<11::AID-HFM2>3.0.CO
[64]  
2-J
[65]  
Ramasesh R., 2001, INTEG MANUF SYST, DOI [10.1108/eum0000000006236, DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000006236]
[66]   Literature review on the agile manufacturing criteria [J].
Ramesh, G. ;
Devadasan, S. R. .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2007, 18 (02) :182-201
[67]   Evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using a combined multiple attribute decision making method [J].
Rao, R. Venkata .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (07) :1975-1989
[68]   Electronic Commerce Customer Relationship Management: A Research Agenda [J].
Nicholas C. Romano ;
Jerry Fjermestad .
Information Technology and Management, 2003, 4 (2-3) :233-258
[69]   A review of agile manufacturing systems [J].
Sanchez, LM ;
Nagi, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (16) :3561-3600
[70]  
Sarkis J., 2001, INTI J BENCHMARKING, V8, P88, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14635770110389816, 10.1108/14635770110389816]