The co-evolution of individual behaviors and social institutions

被引:182
作者
Bowles, S
Choi, JK
Hopfensitz, A
机构
[1] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA
[2] Univ Siena, Fac Econ, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Santa Fe Inst, Dept Econ, Amherst, MA 01002 USA
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Res Expt Econ & Decis Making, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
human cooperation; multi-level selection; intergroup conflicts;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00060-2
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We present agent-based simulations of a model of a deme-structured population in which group differences in social institutions are culturally transmitted and individual behaviors are genetically transmitted. We use a standard extended fitness accounting framework to identify the parameter space for which this co-evolutionary process generates high levels of group-beneficial behaviors. We show that intergroup conflicts may explain the evolutionary success of both: (a) altruistic forms of human sociality towards unrelated members of one's group; and (b) group-level institutional structures such as food sharing which have emerged and diffused repeatedly in a wide variety of ecologies during the course of human history. Group-beneficial behaviors may evolve if (a) they inflict sufficient fitness costs on outgroup individuals and (b) group-level institutions limit the individual fitness costs of these behaviors and thereby attenuate within-group selection against these behaviors. Thus, the evolutionary success of individually costly but group-beneficial behaviors in the relevant environments during the first 90,000 years of anatomically modern human existence may have been a consequence of distinctive human capacities in social institution building. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 147
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]   Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of individuality .2. Conflict mediation [J].
Michod, RE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 263 (1372) :813-822
[42]  
Neves E. G., 1995, REV MUSEU ARQUEOLOGI, V5, P195
[43]   Relatedness in trait group models of social evolution [J].
Pepper, JW .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2000, 206 (03) :355-368
[44]   EXTENSION OF COVARIANCE SELECTION MATHEMATICS [J].
PRICE, GR .
ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1972, 35 (04) :485-&
[45]   REPRODUCTIVE HARMONY VIA MUTUAL POLICING BY WORKERS IN EUSOCIAL HYMENOPTERA [J].
RATNIEKS, FLW .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1988, 132 (02) :217-236
[46]   Was agriculture impossible during the Pleistocene but mandatory during the Holocene? A climate change hypothesis [J].
Richerson, PJ ;
Boyd, R ;
Bettinger, RL .
AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, 2001, 66 (03) :387-411
[47]   GROUP SELECTION BY SELECTIVE EMIGRATION - THE EFFECTS OF MIGRATION AND KIN STRUCTURE [J].
ROGERS, AR .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1990, 135 (03) :398-413
[48]   COMMENTARY - GROUP SELECTION [J].
SMITH, JM .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1976, 51 (02) :277-283
[49]   CAN GROUP-FUNCTIONAL BEHAVIORS EVOLVE BY CULTURAL-GROUP SELECTION - AN EMPIRICAL-TEST [J].
SOLTIS, J ;
BOYD, R ;
RICHERSON, PJ .
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 1995, 36 (03) :473-494
[50]   THEORIES OF KIN AND GROUP SELECTION - A POPULATION-GENETICS PERSPECTIVE [J].
UYENOYAMA, M ;
FELDMAN, MW .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1980, 17 (03) :380-414