Stockout propagation and amplification in supply chain inventory systems

被引:25
作者
Chatfield, Dean C. [1 ]
Hayya, Jack C. [2 ]
Cook, David P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Old Dominion Univ, Coll Business & Publ Adm, Dept Informat Technol & Decis Sci, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business Adm, Dept Supply Chain & Informat Syst, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
inventory control; simulation; supply chain dynamics; amplification; propagation; IMPACT; DISRUPTIONS; MITIGATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2012.697205
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We investigate the existence and magnitude of stockout propagation and stockout amplification in the context of supply chain inventory systems. Stockout amplification is a stage-to-stage increase in overall stockout rates. Stockout propagation is the tendency for stockout at one node to instigate a stockout at a neighbouring node and is conceptually related to the idea of cascading failures in physical systems, such as electrical power grids. We study these concepts in both upstream (supply side) and downstream (demand side) directions in the context of normal operating conditions for an adaptive R, S (periodic, order-up-to) inventory policy. We build a simulation model of a 5-stage serial supply chain that experiences normally distributed customer demands and gamma distributed lead times. We find that stockout propagation exists, but contrary to conventional wisdom, it occurs in the upstream direction. There is little indication that stockout propagation is occurring to any significant degree in the downstream direction. We also find stockout amplification occurring in the upstream direction in scenarios where more aggressively adaptive inventory parameter updating is performed. We discuss implications of this work in the areas of supply chain inventory modelling, ordering decisions, safety stock determination, and the use of adaptive inventory policies.
引用
收藏
页码:1491 / 1507
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Bagchi U., 1986, Journal of Operations Management, V6, P159
[2]   LT variance or LT mean reduction in supply chain management: Which one has a higher impact on SC performance? [J].
Chaharsooghi, S. Kamal ;
Heydari, Jafar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 124 (02) :475-481
[3]  
Chatfield DC, 2004, PROD OPER MANAG, V13, P340, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2004.tb00222.x
[4]   SISCO: An object-oriented supply chain simulation system [J].
Chatfield, Dean C. ;
Harrison, Terry P. ;
Hayya, Jack C. .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2006, 42 (01) :422-434
[5]   Underestimating the bullwhip effect: a simulation study of the decomposability assumption [J].
Chatfield, Dean C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (01) :230-244
[6]   Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: The impact of forecasting, lead times, and information [J].
Chen, F ;
Drezner, Z ;
Ryan, JK ;
Simchi-Levi, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (03) :436-443
[7]  
Chen FR, 2000, PROD OPER MANAG, V9, P19
[8]   Bullwhip effect and inventory oscillations analysis using the beer game model [J].
Coppini, Matteo ;
Rossignoli, Chiara ;
Rossi, Tommaso ;
Strozzi, Fernanda .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (13) :3943-3956
[9]   The severity of supply chain disruptions: Design characteristics and mitigation capabilities [J].
Craighead, Christopher W. ;
Blackhurst, Jennifer ;
Rungtusanatham, M. Johnny ;
Handfield, Robert B. .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2007, 38 (01) :131-156
[10]   Information sharing and coordination mechanisms for managing uncertainty in supply chains: a simulation study [J].
Datta, Partha Priya ;
Christopher, Martin G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2011, 49 (03) :765-803