Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms

被引:239
作者
Band, GPH
van Boxtel, GJM
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Dept Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
response inhibition; stop-signal paradigm; go/no-go paradigm; LRP;
D O I
10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00005-0
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
What is the neurophysiological locus of inhibition when preparation for a manual response is countermanded? This paper evaluates data and models that pertain to inhibitory mechanisms operating in stop paradigms. In a model of De Jong, Coles and Logan (1995), (Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 3, 498-511), a mechanism for nonselective inhibition operates peripheral to the motor cortex, while a selective mechanism operates at a central cortical level. We argue, however, that a peripheral mechanism of inhibition is incorrectly inferred from inhibition data available to date. Neurophysiological and psychophysiological data suggest that inhibitory processes always involve the cortex, and inhibitory effects are exerted upstream from the primary motor cortex. The prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia are candidate agents of response inhibition, whereas possible sites of inhibition are the thalamus and motor cortex. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PsycINFO classifications: 2260; 2330; 2530; 2540; 2560.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 211
页数:33
相关论文
共 102 条
[61]   EARLY ONSET AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT PROGRESSIVE MUSCULAR-DYSTROPHY PRESENTING IN CHILDHOOD AS A BECKER PHENOTYPE - THE IMPORTANCE OF DYSTROPHIN AND MOLECULAR GENETIC-ANALYSIS [J].
MILLER, G ;
BEGGS, AH ;
TOWFIGHI, J .
NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS, 1992, 2 (02) :121-124
[62]   EFFECTS OF PRELIMINARY PERCEPTUAL OUTPUT ON NEURONAL-ACTIVITY OF THE PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX [J].
MILLER, J ;
RIEHLE, A ;
REQUIN, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (04) :1121-1138
[63]  
NEAFSEY EJ, 1990, PROG BRAIN RES, V85, P147
[64]   TASK-RELATED CHANGES IN THE EFFECT OF MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION ON SPINAL NEURONS IN MAN [J].
NIELSEN, J ;
PETERSEN, N ;
DEUSCHL, G ;
BALLEGAARD, M .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1993, 471 :223-243
[65]  
Norman D. A., 1986, CONSCIOUSNESS SELF R, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1
[66]  
Ollman RT, 1973, ATTENTION PERFORM, V4, P571
[67]   CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS OF HUMAN INSULAR CORTEX STIMULATION [J].
OPPENHEIMER, SM ;
GELB, A ;
GIRVIN, JP ;
HACHINSKI, VC .
NEUROLOGY, 1992, 42 (09) :1727-1732
[68]   DOES MOTOR PROGRAMMING NECESSITATE RESPONSE EXECUTION [J].
OSMAN, A ;
KORNBLUM, S ;
MEYER, DE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (01) :183-198
[69]   ON THE TRANSMISSION OF PARTIAL INFORMATION - INFERENCES FROM MOVEMENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS [J].
OSMAN, A ;
COLES, MGH ;
DONCHIN, E ;
BASHORE, TR ;
MEYER, DE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (01) :217-232
[70]   THE POINT-OF-NO-RETURN IN CHOICE REACTION-TIME - CONTROLLED AND BALLISTIC STAGES OF RESPONSE PREPARATION [J].
OSMAN, A ;
KORNBLUM, S ;
MEYER, DE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1986, 12 (03) :243-258