Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting?

被引:349
作者
Darnall, Nicole [1 ]
Henriques, Irene [2 ]
Sadorsky, Perry [2 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
Institutional theory; Resource-based view of the firm; Environmental strategy; Environmental management system; Competitive advantage; Business performance;
D O I
10.1016/j.intman.2007.09.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
With the worldwide increase in the adoption of environmental management systems (EMSs), some research has emerged that evaluates the reasons why facilities adopt them. However, there is little information about how these motivations extend to different international settings, and the link between the comprehensiveness of an EMS and business performance has yet to be demonstrated. While both institutional pressures and resources and capabilities may encourage EMS adoption and improved business performance, questions remain about whether organizations that are motivated mainly by their resources and capabilities benefit to the same extent as organizations that are driven to adopt an EMS mainly because of institutional pressures. We analyze these relationships using OECD survey data from manufacturing facilities operating in Canada, Germany, Hungary, and the United States. Our results show that facilities that are motivated to adopt more comprehensive EMSs because of their complementary resources and capabilities, such as export orientation, employee commitment and environmental R&D, (as opposed to institutional pressures) observe greater overall facility-level business performance. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 376
页数:13
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WORLD FACTB 2005
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ENV POLICY CORPORATE
[3]  
[Anonymous], GREENER MANAGEMENT I
[4]   Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance [J].
Anton, WRQ ;
Deltas, G ;
Khanna, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 48 (01) :632-654
[5]  
Aragón-Correa JA, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P71
[6]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[7]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[8]  
Bansal P, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P93, DOI [10.2307/20159562, 10.5465/20159562]
[9]   Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001 [J].
Bansal, P ;
Hunter, T .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2003, 46 (03) :289-299
[10]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736