Epidermal growth factor receptor messenger RNA expression, gene dosage, and gefitinib sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer

被引:88
作者
Dziadziuszko, Rafal
Witta, Samir E.
Cappuzzo, Federico
Park, Seongjin
Tanaka, Koji
Danenberg, Peter V.
Baron, Anna E.
Crino, Lucio
Franklin, Wilbur A.
Bunn, Paul A., Jr.
Varella-Garcia, Marileila
Danenberg, Kathleen D.
Hirsch, Fred R.
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Ctr Canc, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Med Univ Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
[4] Bellaria Hosp, Bologna, Italy
[5] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Mie Univ, Sch Med, Tsu, Mie 514, Japan
[7] Univ So Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Response Genet Inc, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0106
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mRNA expression and EGFR gene dosage by quantitative PCR in tumor samples obtained from patients with gefitinib-treated non - small cell lung cancer were analyzed in order to determine the association with treatment outcome, clinical, and biological features [EGFR copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), EGFR tyrosine kinase mutations, and EGFR protein expression]. Experimental Design: EGFR mRNA expression was measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR in 64 patients, and EGFR gene dosage was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR in 82 patients from paraffin-embedded specimens. Results: EGFR mRNA expression was higher in responders to gefitinib as compared with non-responders (P = 0.012). Patients with high EGFR mRNA expression (>5.01) had 43% response probability, whereas patients with low EGFR mRNA expression had 8% response probability (P = 0.006). Patients with high EGFR mRNA expression had longer median progression-free (5.3 versus 2.8 months, P = 0.028) but not overall survival (13.8 versus 10.9 months, P = 0.87). EGFR mRNA expression was higher in FISH-positive patients (P = 0.001) and in patients with positive EGFR immunostaining (P < 0.001) but not in patients with EGFR mutations (P = 0.19). EGFR gene dosage did not predict response (P = 0.54), progression-free (P = 0.73), or overall survival (P = 0.89). EGFR gene dosage was not associated with FISH positivity (P = 0.15), relative mRNA expression (P = 0.27), EGFR mutation status (P = 0.39), and EGFR protein expression (P = 0.35). Conclusion: EGFR mRNA expression is a predictive biomarker for response to gefitinib and to progression-free survival after gefitinib treatment. EGFR gene dosage is neither predictive for response nor progression-free nor overall survival.
引用
收藏
页码:3078 / 3084
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[21]   Epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations and increased copy numbers predict gefitinib sensitivity in patients with recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Takano, T ;
Ohe, Y ;
Sakamoto, H ;
Tsuta, K ;
Matsuno, Y ;
Tateishi, U ;
Yamamoto, S ;
Nokihara, H ;
Yamamoto, N ;
Sekine, I ;
Kunitoh, H ;
Shibata, T ;
Sakiyama, T ;
Yoshida, T ;
Tamura, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (28) :6829-6837
[22]   Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with improved survival in gefitinib-treated chemorefractory lung adenocarcinomas [J].
Taron, M ;
Ichinose, Y ;
Rosell, R ;
Mok, T ;
Massuti, B ;
Zamora, L ;
Mate, JL ;
Manegold, C ;
Ono, M ;
Queralt, C ;
Jahan, T ;
Sanchez, JJ ;
Sanchez-Ronco, M ;
Hsue, V ;
Jablons, D ;
Sanchez, JM ;
Moran, T .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (16) :5878-5885
[23]   Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) [J].
Thatcher, N ;
Chang, A ;
Parikh, P ;
Pereira, JR ;
Ciuleanu, T ;
von Pawel, J ;
Thongprasert, S ;
Tan, EH ;
Pemberton, K ;
Archer, V ;
Carroll, K .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9496) :1527-1537
[24]  
Therasse P, 2000, J NATL CANCER I, V92, P205, DOI 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
[25]   Erlotinib in lung cancer - Molecular and clinical predictors of outcome [J].
Tsao, MS ;
Sakurada, A ;
Cutz, JC ;
Zhu, CQ ;
Kamel-Reid, S ;
Squire, J ;
Lorimer, I ;
Zhang, T ;
Liu, N ;
Daneshmand, M ;
Marrano, P ;
Santos, GD ;
Lagarde, A ;
Richardson, F ;
Seymour, L ;
Whitehead, M ;
Ding, KY ;
Pater, J ;
Shepherd, FA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (02) :133-144
[26]   Evaluation of the quantitative analytical methods real-time PCR for HER-2 gene quantification and ELISA of serum HER-2 protein and comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochernistry for determining HER-2 status in breast cancer patients [J].
Tse, C ;
Brault, D ;
Gligorov, J ;
Antoine, M ;
Neumann, R ;
Lotz, JP ;
Capeau, J .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 51 (07) :1093-1101
[27]   Expression of HER2 and the coamplified genes GRB7 and MLN64 in human breast cancer:: Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR as a diagnostic alternative to immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization [J].
Vinatzer, U ;
Dampier, B ;
Streubel, B ;
Pacher, M ;
Seewald, MJ ;
Stratowa, C ;
Kaserer, K ;
Schreiber, M .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (23) :8348-8357