Managing Complexity and Uncertainty in Regional Governance Networks: A Critical Analysis of State Rescaling in England

被引:16
作者
Ayres, Sarah [1 ]
Stafford, Ian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Policy Studies, Bristol BS8 1TZ, Avon, England
[2] Cardiff Univ, Wales Inst Econ & Social Res Data & Methods, Cardiff CF10 3BB, S Glam, Wales
关键词
Regions; Decentralization; England; Complexity; Network management strategies; Network outcomes; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; UNEVEN DEVELOPMENT; ENGLISH REGIONS; DEVOLUTION; PERFORMANCE; POLITICS; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1080/00343404.2012.672727
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Ayres S. and Stafford I. Managing complexity and uncertainty in regional governance networks: a critical analysis of state rescaling in England, Regional Studies. Network management is viewed as a way of dealing with uncertainty in complex policy networks, but little is known about the types of network management strategies employed by regional actors to manage vertical and horizontal relations. Two central questions guide this paper. What network management strategies were employed to manage complexity and uncertainty in regional governance networks in England? How can past lessons be harnessed to inform future network strategies for managing territorial networks? The paper concludes that regional network management strategies were effective in securing process' outcomes, but that content' outcomes, in the form of genuine discretion over policy, were unattainable without the authorization of central government.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 235
页数:17
相关论文
共 84 条
[51]   THE IMPACT OF NETWORK MANAGEMENT ON OUTCOMES IN GOVERNANCE NETWORKS [J].
Klijn, Erik-Hans ;
Steijn, Bram ;
Edelenbos, Jurian .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2010, 88 (04) :1063-1082
[52]   Governance and governance networks in Europe - An assessment of ten years of research on the theme [J].
Klijn, Erik-Hans .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2008, 10 (04) :505-525
[53]  
Koppenjan J., 2004, Managing Uncertainty in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making
[54]   Creating a playing field for assessing the effectiveness of network collaboration by performance measures [J].
Koppenjan, Joop .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2008, 10 (06) :699-714
[55]   Editorial: Rescaling the state: new modes of institutional-territorial organization [J].
Lobao, Linda ;
Martin, Ron ;
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2009, 2 (01) :3-12
[56]   Patterns of Regional Authority [J].
Marks, Gary ;
Hooghe, Liesbet ;
Schakel, Arjan H. .
REGIONAL AND FEDERAL STUDIES, 2008, 18 (2-3) :167-181
[57]   Understanding British government: Analysing competing models [J].
Marsh, David .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2008, 10 (02) :251-268
[58]   Evaluating democratic performance: Methodologies for assessing the relationship between network governance and citizens [J].
Mathur, Navdeep ;
Skelcher, Chris .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2007, 67 (02) :228-237
[59]   Devolution and development: Territorial justice and the North-South divide [J].
Morgan, K .
PUBLIUS-THE JOURNAL OF FEDERALISM, 2006, 36 (01) :189-206
[60]   Governance in the English regions: moving beyond muddling through? [J].
Pearce, Graham ;
Mawson, John .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2009, 22 (07) :623-+