An extended compromise ratio method for fuzzy group multi-attribute decision making with SWOT analysis

被引:24
作者
Hatami-Marbini, Adel [1 ]
Tavana, Madjid [2 ]
Hajipour, Vahid [3 ]
Kangi, Fatemeh [3 ]
Kazemi, Abolfazl [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Ctr Operat Res & Econometr, Louvain Sch Management, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[2] La Salle Univ, Lindback Distinguished Chair Informat Syst & Deci, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Qazvin Branch, Fac Ind & Mech Engn, Qazvin, Iran
关键词
Multi-attribute decision making; Compromise ratio method; Fuzzy distance measure; Fuzzy ranking method; SWOT analysis; MODEL; OPERATORS; SELECTION; NUMBERS; TOPSIS; CONSENSUS; DISTANCES; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2013.04.016
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) is a well-known multi-attribute decision making (MADM) method that is used to identify the most attractive alternative solution among a finite set of alternatives based on the simultaneous minimization of the distance from an ideal solution (IS) and the maximization of the distance from the nadir solution (NS). We propose an alternative compromise ratio method (CRM) using an efficient and powerful distance measure for solving the group MADM problems. In the proposed CRM, similar to TOPSIS, the chosen alternative should be simultaneously as close as possible to the IS and as far away as possible from the NS. The conventional MADM problems require well-defined and precise data; however, the values associated with the parameters in the real-world are often imprecise, vague, uncertain or incomplete. Fuzzy sets provide a powerful tool for dealing with the ambiguous data. We capture the decision makers' (DMs') judgments with linguistic variables and represent their importance weights with fuzzy sets. The fuzzy group MADM (FGMADM) method proposed in this study improves the usability of the CRM. We integrate the FGMADM method into a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis framework to show the applicability of the proposed method in a solar panel manufacturing firm in Canada. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3459 / 3472
页数:14
相关论文
共 90 条
[61]   A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments [J].
Parreiras, R. O. ;
Ekel, P. Ya. ;
Martini, J. S. C. ;
Palhares, R. M. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2010, 180 (07) :1075-1089
[62]   Planning a TV advertising campaign: A crisp multiobjective programming model from fuzzy basic data [J].
Perez-Gladish, B. ;
Gonzalez, I. ;
Bilbao-Terol, A. ;
Arenas-Parra, M. .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 38 (1-2) :84-94
[63]   DECISION-AID AND DECISION-MAKING [J].
ROY, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 45 (2-3) :324-331
[64]   Fuzzy distances based FMAGDM compromise ratio method and application [J].
Rui, Zhenfeng ;
Li, Dengfeng .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS, 2010, 21 (03) :455-460
[65]   An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making [J].
Shih, Hsu-Shih ;
Shyur, Huan-Jyh ;
Lee, E. Stanley .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2007, 45 (7-8) :801-813
[66]   A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection [J].
Shyur, Huan-Jyh ;
Shih, Hsu-Shih .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2006, 44 (7-8) :749-761
[67]   A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers based on fuzzy simulation analysis method [J].
Sun, HJ ;
Wu, HJ .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2006, 174 (01) :755-767
[68]   A group AHP-TOPSIS framework for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA [J].
Tavana, Madjid ;
Hatami-Marbini, Adel .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (11) :13588-13603
[69]   Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure [J].
Tran, L ;
Duckstein, L .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 130 (03) :331-341
[70]  
Triantaphyllou E., 2000, MULTICRITERIA DECISI, P5, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_2]