Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility

被引:369
作者
Harvey, N
Fischer, I
机构
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.1997.2697
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Why do people take advice? To find out, we provided a low, medium, or high level of training on a task in which judgments varied in importance, Then, in a test session, we eliminated feedback but made advice available. Different features of our results suggest that there are three distinct reasons for taking advice, First, even experienced judges took some advice from novices: people appear reluctant to reject completely the help offered to them. Second, all judges took more advice from advisors more experienced than themselves, and the amount that they took was related to the difference in level of experience: people appeared to be trying to use advice to improve their judgments. Third, experience enabled people to distinguish judgments on the basis of their importance. Experienced judges took about twice as much advice for the most important judgments: they appeared to be sharing responsibility when the risk associated with error was high. Thus, we model advice-taking in terms of three components: accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 133
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]   EFFECTS OF FUNCTION FORM AND CUE VALIDITY ON SUBJECTS HYPOTHESES IN PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE TASKS [J].
BREHMER, B ;
KUYLENST.J ;
LILJERGR.JE .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1974, 11 (03) :338-354
[12]  
Bulmer M., 1993, ADVISING W EUROPEAN
[13]   EVALUATION OF EXTRAPOLATIVE FORECASTING METHODS - RESULTS OF A SURVEY OF ACADEMICIANS AND PRACTITIONERS [J].
CARBONE, R ;
ARMSTRONG, JS .
JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1982, 1 (02) :215-217
[14]   HEURISTIC PROCESSING CAN BIAS SYSTEMATIC PROCESSING - EFFECTS OF SOURCE CREDIBILITY, ARGUMENT AMBIGUITY, AND TASK IMPORTANCE ON ATTITUDE JUDGMENT [J].
CHAIKEN, S ;
MAHESWARAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (03) :460-473
[15]   APPLES, ORANGES AND MEAN-SQUARE ERROR [J].
CHATFIELD, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1988, 4 (04) :515-518
[16]   INFORMATION MISPURCHASE IN JUDGMENT TASKS - A TASK-DRIVEN CAUSAL MECHANISM [J].
CONNOLLY, T ;
WHOLEY, DR .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1988, 42 (01) :75-87
[17]  
EDGELL SE, 1993, INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DECISION MAKING, P43
[18]   THE EVALUATION OF EXTRAPOLATIVE FORECASTING METHODS [J].
FILDES, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1992, 8 (01) :81-98
[19]  
GARDNER DH, 1995, APPL COGNITIVE PSYCH, V9, P555
[20]   COGNITIVE DEPENDENCE ON LINEAR AND NONLINEAR CUES [J].
HAMMOND, KR ;
SUMMERS, DA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1965, 72 (03) :215-224