Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility

被引:369
作者
Harvey, N
Fischer, I
机构
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.1997.2697
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Why do people take advice? To find out, we provided a low, medium, or high level of training on a task in which judgments varied in importance, Then, in a test session, we eliminated feedback but made advice available. Different features of our results suggest that there are three distinct reasons for taking advice, First, even experienced judges took some advice from novices: people appear reluctant to reject completely the help offered to them. Second, all judges took more advice from advisors more experienced than themselves, and the amount that they took was related to the difference in level of experience: people appeared to be trying to use advice to improve their judgments. Third, experience enabled people to distinguish judgments on the basis of their importance. Experienced judges took about twice as much advice for the most important judgments: they appeared to be sharing responsibility when the risk associated with error was high. Thus, we model advice-taking in terms of three components: accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 133
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ADAMS JA, 1973, J MOTOR BEHAV, V5, P217, DOI 10.1080/00222895.1973.10734968
[2]   THE INFLUENCE OF FORMAL, SUBSTANTIVE, AND CONTEXTUAL TASK PROPERTIES ON THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT FORMS OF FEEDBACK IN MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY-LEARNING TASKS [J].
ADELMAN, L .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1981, 27 (03) :423-442
[3]   ERROR MEASURES AND THE CHOICE OF A FORECAST METHOD [J].
AHLBURG, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1992, 8 (01) :99-100
[4]   2 METHODS OF REDUCING OVERCONFIDENCE [J].
ARKES, HR ;
CHRISTENSEN, C ;
LAI, C ;
BLUMER, C .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1987, 39 (01) :133-144
[5]   ERROR MEASURES FOR GENERALIZING ABOUT FORECASTING METHODS - EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
COLLOPY, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1992, 8 (01) :69-80
[6]   ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TASK-PERFORMANCE AND ASSOCIATED VERBALIZABLE KNOWLEDGE [J].
BERRY, DC ;
BROADBENT, DE .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 36 (02) :209-231
[7]   SOURCE CREDIBILITY IN SOCIAL JUDGMENT - BIAS, EXPERTISE, AND THE JUDGES POINT OF VIEW [J].
BIRNBAUM, MH ;
STEGNER, SE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 37 (01) :48-74
[8]   COMBINING INFORMATION FROM SOURCES THAT VARY IN CREDIBILITY [J].
BIRNBAUM, MH ;
WONG, R ;
WONG, LK .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1976, 4 (03) :330-336
[9]   AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
COX, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1964, 26 (02) :211-252
[10]   SINGLE-CUE PROBABILITY LEARNING AS A FUNCTION OF SIGN AND MAGNITUDE OF CORRELATION BETWEEN CUE AND CRITERION [J].
BREHMER, B .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1973, 9 (03) :377-395