Relationship quality as a resource to build industrial brand equity when products are uncertain and future-based

被引:35
作者
Marquardt, Adam J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Richmond, Robins Sch Business, Dept Mkt, Richmond, VA 23173 USA
关键词
Industrial marketing; Industrial brand management; Relationship marketing; Relationship quality; Resource advantage theory; DIFFERENTIATE; COMMITMENT; SERVICE; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.07.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article extends our understanding of industrial branding and the influence of buyer-seller relationships by examining key constructs within an industrial context where products are uncertain and future-based. SEM results elicited from 249 buyer surveys empirically validate satisfaction, trust and commitment as dimensions of relationship quality, and show that buyer-seller relationship quality facilitates direct and indirect seller brand equity accruals. Findings reveal that while focusing on sellers' corporate and product brands is good advice for building buyer-seller relationships, seller resource allocations to these areas should vary depending upon the selected target market segment(s). Findings support that sellers should place more focus on developing quality relationships with buyers than they should in focusing on the non-relational attributes of their corporate brands; however, if sellers choose to bypass building high quality customer relationships, they should instead funnel resources into their product brand offerings. Findings demonstrate that buyers credit their own skills and acumen when evaluating products with which they are confident, and ascribe increased value to the involvement of the seller as their attitude and certainty decrease. These findings provide strategic guidance to the sellers of uncertain and future-based industrial products. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1386 / 1397
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Leveraging the corporate brand [J].
Aaker, DA .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2004, 46 (03) :6-+
[2]   Dimensions of brand personality [J].
Aaker, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1997, 34 (03) :347-356
[3]  
Agarwal ManojK., 1996, MARKET LETT, V7, P237, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00435740
[4]  
Anderson J., 2009, Business Market Management: Understanding, Creating and Delivering Value, V3rd edn
[5]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[6]  
Armstrong G., 2007, Marketing: an introduction, VEighth
[7]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[8]   A longitudinal examination of the effects of retailer-manufacturer brand alliances: The role of perceived fit [J].
Arnett, Dennis ;
Laverie, Debra ;
Wilcox, James .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2010, 26 (1-2) :5-27
[9]   To invest, or not to invest, in brands? Drivers of brand relevance in B2B markets [J].
Backhaus, Klaus ;
Steiner, Michael ;
Luegger, Kai .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2011, 40 (07) :1082-1092
[10]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120