Arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: Requirements and signal options

被引:51
作者
Conturo, TE
Akbudak, E
Kotys, MS
Chen, ML
Chun, SJ
Hsu, RM
Sweeney, CC
Markham, J
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Phys, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
MRI; perfusion; phase; arterial input function (AIF); CBF; validation;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20457
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Cerebral perfusion imaging using dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) has been the subject of considerable research and shows promise for basic science and clinical use. In DSC. the MRI signals in brain tissue and feeding arteries are monitored dynamically in response to a bolus injection of paramagnetic agents, such as gadolinium (Gd) chelates. DSC has the potential to allow quantitative imaging of parameters such as cerebral blood flow (CBF) with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in a short scan time; however, quantitation depends critically on accurate and precise measurement of the arterial input function (AIF). We discuss many requirements and factors that make it difficult to measure the AIF. The AIF signal should be linear with respect to Gd concentration, convertible to the same concentration scale as the tissue signal, and independent of hematocrit. Complicated relationships between signal and concentration can violate these requirements. The additional requirements of a high SNR and high spatial/temporal resolution are technically challengirig. AIF measurements can also be affected by signal saturation and aliasing, as well as dispersion/delay between the AIF sampling site and the tissue. We present new in vivo preliminary results for magnitude-based (Delta R2*) and phase-based (Delta phi) AIF measurements that show a linearity advantage of phase, and a disparity in the scaling of Delta phi AIFs, Delta R2* AIFs, and Delta R2* tissue curves. Finally, we discuss issues related to the choice of AIF signal for quantitative perfusion imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 703
页数:7
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Arterial input functions from MR phase imaging [J].
Akbudak, E ;
Conturo, TE .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 36 (06) :809-815
[2]   Contrast-agent phase effects: An experimental system for analysis of susceptibility, concentration, and bolus input function kinetics [J].
Akbudak, E ;
Norberg, RE ;
Conturo, TE .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (06) :990-1002
[3]  
AKBUDAK E, 2004, P ISMRM WORKSH QUANT, P10
[4]  
AKBUDAK E, 1999, P 7 ANN M ISMRM PHIL
[5]  
AKBUDAK E, 2004, P ISMRM WORKSH QUANT, P138
[6]  
AKBUDAK E, 1994, P 2 ANN M SMR SAN FR
[7]  
AKBUDAK E, 1996, THESIS WASHINGTON U
[8]  
AKBUDAK E, 1998, P 6 ANN M ISMRM SYDN
[9]  
ALSOP DD, 2002, P 10 ANN M ISMRM HON
[10]   FUNCTIONAL CEREBRAL IMAGING BY SUSCEPTIBILITY-CONTRAST NMR [J].
BELLIVEAU, JW ;
ROSEN, BR ;
KANTOR, HL ;
RZEDZIAN, RR ;
KENNEDY, DN ;
MCKINSTRY, RC ;
VEVEA, JM ;
COHEN, MS ;
PYKETT, IL ;
BRADY, TJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1990, 14 (03) :538-546