A decision model for evaluation of flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal factors

被引:48
作者
Sarkis, J
Talluri, S
机构
[1] Fairleigh Dickinson Univ, S J Silberman Coll Business, Dept Informat Syst & Sci, Teaneck, NJ 07666 USA
[2] Clark Univ, Grad Sch Management, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/002075499190356
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper presents a model for evaluating alternative Flexible Manufacturing Systems by considering both quantitative and qualitative factors. The evaluation process utilizes a recently proposed Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model, which incorporates both ordinal and cardinal measures, in conjunction with new extensions in DEA. The paper contributes to the body of knowledge in two important ways. First, it provides a new model based on pair-wise comparisons of specific alternatives, which significantly improves the discriminatory power of DEA. The second major contribution is to detail the model's utility in its application for evaluating strategic manufacturing technologies, specifically Flexible Manufacturing Systems. The consideration of both tangible and intangible factors. which is a primary goal in strategic evaluation of systems, is achieved in this methodology. The model is illustrated through an application on a previously reported data set. The analysis of results provide useful insights that include both seller's and buyer's perspectives of system evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:2927 / 2938
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
MOHANTY RP, 1993, INT J PRODUCTION PLA, V4, P260
[22]   OPTIMAL ACQUISITION OF AUTOMATED FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES .2. [J].
MONAHAN, GE ;
SMUNT, TL .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (02) :288-300
[23]   AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF ARTICULATION OF PREFERENCES IN MULTIPLE CRITERION DECISION-MAKING (MCDM) METHODS [J].
NARASIMHAN, R ;
VICKERY, SK .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1988, 19 (04) :880-888
[24]  
Park C. S., 1988, Engineering Economist, V34, P1, DOI 10.1080/00137918808902975
[25]   A JUSTIFICATION METHODOLOGY FOR AUTOMATED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES [J].
PARSAEI, HR ;
WILHELM, MR .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1989, 16 (03) :363-373
[26]   APPLICATION OF OUTRANKING METHODS TO ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL JUSTIFICATION OF CIM SYSTEMS [J].
PARSAEI, HR ;
WILHELM, MR ;
KOLLI, SS .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 25 (1-4) :357-360
[27]  
Proctor M. D., 1992, Engineering Economist, V38, P45, DOI 10.1080/00137919208903086
[28]  
Sarkis J., 1995, International Journal of Project Management, V13, P177, DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(94)00008-Z
[29]   AN IDEF0 FUNCTIONAL PLANNING-MODEL FOR THE STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION OF CIM SYSTEMS [J].
SARKIS, J ;
LIN, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 1994, 7 (02) :100-115
[30]  
Sarkis J., 1997, Engineering Economist, V43, P25, DOI 10.1080/00137919708903188