Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges

被引:1720
作者
Lang, Daniel J. [1 ]
Wiek, Arnim [2 ]
Bergmann, Matthias [1 ,3 ]
Stauffacher, Michael [4 ]
Martens, Pim [1 ,5 ]
Moll, Peter
Swilling, Mark [6 ]
Thomas, Christopher J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luneburg, Inst Eth & Transdisciplinary Sustainabil Res, Fac Sustainabil, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Inst Social Ecol Res, D-60486 Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis IED, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Maastricht Univ, Int Ctr Integrated Assessment & Sustainable Dev I, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Stellenbosch, Sch Publ Leadership, ZA-7535 Bellville, South Africa
[7] Aberystwyth Univ, Inst Biol Environm & Rural Sci, Penglais, Wales
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Transdisciplinary sustainability research; Design principles; Challenges; Evaluation; SWISS PREALPINE REGION; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; DECISION-MAKING; NUCLEAR-WASTE; SYSTEMS; TRANSITION; SCENARIOS; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is emerging agreement that sustainability challenges require new ways of knowledge production and decision-making. One key aspect of sustainability science, therefore, is the involvement of actors from outside academia into the research process in order to integrate the best available knowledge, reconcile values and preferences, as well as create ownership for problems and solution options. Transdisciplinary, community-based, interactive, or participatory research approaches are often suggested as appropriate means to meet both the requirements posed by real-world problems as well as the goals of sustainability science as a transformational scientific field. Dispersed literature on these approaches and a variety of empirical projects applying them make it difficult for interested researchers and practitioners to review and become familiar with key components and design principles of how to do transdisciplinary sustainability research. Starting from a conceptual model of an ideal-typical transdisciplinary research process, this article synthesizes and structures such a set of principles from various strands of the literature and empirical experiences. We then elaborate on them, looking at challenges and some coping strategies as experienced in transdisciplinary sustainability projects in Europe, North America, South America, Africa, and Asia. The article concludes with future research needed in order to further enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 43
页数:19
相关论文
共 90 条
[41]   Technical safety vs. public involvement? A case study on the unrealized project for the disposal of nuclear waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland) [J].
Krutli, Pius ;
Flueler, Thomas ;
Stauffacher, Michael ;
Wiek, Arnim ;
Scholz, Roland W. .
JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2010, 7 (03) :229-244
[42]   Expert views on sustainability and technology implementation [J].
Laws, D ;
Scholz, RW ;
Shiroyama, H ;
Susskind, L ;
Suzuki, T ;
Weber, O .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2004, 11 (03) :247-261
[43]  
Maasen S., 2006, Science Public Policy (SPP), V33, P399, DOI [10.3152/147154306781778803, DOI 10.3152/147154306781778803]
[44]   Bed net use and associated factors in a rice farming community in Central Kenya [J].
Ng'ang'a, Peter N. ;
Jayasinghe, Gayathri ;
Kimani, Violet ;
Shililu, Josephat ;
Kabutha, Charity ;
Kabuage, Lucy ;
Githure, John ;
Mutero, Clifford .
MALARIA JOURNAL, 2009, 8
[45]  
Parodi O, 1998, P 2 WORLD C PHOT SOL
[46]  
Pohl C., 2007, Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research
[47]   What is progress in transdisciplinary research? [J].
Pohl, Christian .
FUTURES, 2011, 43 (06) :618-626
[48]   Impact assessment of transdisciplinary research: In need of a more distanced view [J].
Pregernig, Michael .
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2007, 16 (01) :46-51
[49]   Modulating societal acceptance in new energy projects: Towards a toolkit methodology for project managers [J].
Raven, R. P. J. M. ;
Mourik, R. M. ;
Feenstra, C. F. J. ;
Heiskanen, E. .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (05) :564-574
[50]   Six Guiding Principles for Evaluating Mode-2 Strategies for Sustainable Development [J].
Regeer, Barbara J. ;
Hoes, Anne-Charlotte ;
van Amstel-van Saane, Mariette ;
Caron-Flinterman, Francisca F. ;
Bunders, Joske F. G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2009, 30 (04) :515-537