Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges

被引:1720
作者
Lang, Daniel J. [1 ]
Wiek, Arnim [2 ]
Bergmann, Matthias [1 ,3 ]
Stauffacher, Michael [4 ]
Martens, Pim [1 ,5 ]
Moll, Peter
Swilling, Mark [6 ]
Thomas, Christopher J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luneburg, Inst Eth & Transdisciplinary Sustainabil Res, Fac Sustainabil, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Inst Social Ecol Res, D-60486 Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis IED, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Maastricht Univ, Int Ctr Integrated Assessment & Sustainable Dev I, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Stellenbosch, Sch Publ Leadership, ZA-7535 Bellville, South Africa
[7] Aberystwyth Univ, Inst Biol Environm & Rural Sci, Penglais, Wales
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Transdisciplinary sustainability research; Design principles; Challenges; Evaluation; SWISS PREALPINE REGION; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; DECISION-MAKING; NUCLEAR-WASTE; SYSTEMS; TRANSITION; SCENARIOS; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is emerging agreement that sustainability challenges require new ways of knowledge production and decision-making. One key aspect of sustainability science, therefore, is the involvement of actors from outside academia into the research process in order to integrate the best available knowledge, reconcile values and preferences, as well as create ownership for problems and solution options. Transdisciplinary, community-based, interactive, or participatory research approaches are often suggested as appropriate means to meet both the requirements posed by real-world problems as well as the goals of sustainability science as a transformational scientific field. Dispersed literature on these approaches and a variety of empirical projects applying them make it difficult for interested researchers and practitioners to review and become familiar with key components and design principles of how to do transdisciplinary sustainability research. Starting from a conceptual model of an ideal-typical transdisciplinary research process, this article synthesizes and structures such a set of principles from various strands of the literature and empirical experiences. We then elaborate on them, looking at challenges and some coping strategies as experienced in transdisciplinary sustainability projects in Europe, North America, South America, Africa, and Asia. The article concludes with future research needed in order to further enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 43
页数:19
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IEEE ENG MANAGEMENT, DOI DOI 10.1109/EMR.2007.4296430
[2]  
[Anonymous], UNITY KNOWLEDGE TRAN
[3]   Relating the philosophy and practice of ecological economics: The role of concepts, models, and case studies in inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability research [J].
Baumgaertner, Stefan ;
Becker, Christian ;
Frank, Karin ;
Mueller, Birgit ;
Quaas, Martin .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 67 (03) :384-393
[4]  
Bergmann M., 2010, Methoden transdisziplinarer Forschung. Ein Uberblick mit Anwendungsbeispielen
[5]  
Bergmann M., 2008, Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, P89, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3_6
[6]  
Bergmann M, 2005, 13 ISOE
[7]   Normative expectations in systems innovation [J].
Berkhout, Frans .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2006, 18 (3-4) :299-311
[8]   Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability [J].
Blackstock, K. L. ;
Kelly, G. J. ;
Horsey, B. L. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 60 (04) :726-742
[9]   Educating Students in Real-world Sustainability Research: Vision and Implementation [J].
Brundiers K. ;
Wiek A. .
Innovative Higher Education, 2011, 36 (2) :107-124
[10]   How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy? [J].
Bunders, Joske F. G. ;
Broerse, Jacqueline E. W. ;
Keil, Florian ;
Pohl, Christian ;
Scholz, Roland W. ;
Zweekhorst, Marjolein B. M. .
KNOWLEDGE DEMOCRACY: CONSEQUENCES FOR SCIENCE, POLITICS, AND MEDIA, 2010, :125-152