Tracing back to the source: Understanding the corporate governance of boards of directors in Chinese SOEs

被引:3
作者
Zhengfei Lu [1 ]
Jigao Zhu [2 ]
机构
[1] Guanghua School of Management, Peking University
[2] Business School, University of International Business and Economics
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
SOEs; Board of directors; Independence; Governance effect;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F276.1 [国有企业经济]; F271 [企业体制];
学科分类号
1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Based on the relevant theories of corporate governance and the special institutional background of Chinese state-owned enterprises(SOEs), this paper systematically reviews the literature on the independence and governance effect of SOE boards. We find that the governance effect of SOE boards is driven by the dual characteristics of SOEs: state involvement in ownership and market incentives. With the state involved in ownership, SOEs adhere to the leadership of the Communist Party of China(CPC), which results in an enhanced governance effect. Under market incentives, SOEs tend to have an optimal board structure that helps mitigate both the shareholder–management agency problem(Type I agency problem) and the controlling shareholder–minority shareholder agency problem(Type II agency problem). In terms of the governance effect of boards, directors appointed by non-controlling shareholders are effective in alleviating Type I and Type II agency problems, and this highlights the importance of mixed-ownership reforms in SOEs. Independent directors,especially those with a professional background, also play a role in improving corporate governance. However, independent directors in SOEs have relatively weak incentives to monitor, which limits their governance effect. This paper shows positive implications for promoting mixed-ownership reforms and improving board governance in SOEs.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 145
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   公司治理研究40年:脉络与展望 [J].
李维安 ;
郝臣 ;
崔光耀 ;
郑敏娜 ;
孟乾坤 .
外国经济与管理, 2019, 41 (12) :161-185
[2]   国有企业非实际控制人的董事会权力与并购效率 [J].
逯东 ;
黄丹 ;
杨丹 .
管理世界, 2019, 35 (06) :119-141
[3]   国有企业混合所有制改革模式和公司治理——基于招商局集团的案例分析 [J].
沈昊 ;
杨梅英 .
管理世界, 2019, 35 (04) :171-182
[4]   连锁董事具有实质独立性吗?——基于投资者市场反应的视角 [J].
彭凯 ;
孙茂竹 ;
胡熠 .
中国软科学, 2018, (09) :113-129
[5]   国有企业的政府放权意愿与混合所有制改革 [J].
蔡贵龙 ;
郑国坚 ;
马新啸 ;
卢锐 .
经济研究, 2018, 53 (09) :99-115
[6]   本地独立董事监督了吗?——基于国有企业高管薪酬视角的考察 [J].
罗进辉 ;
向元高 ;
林筱勋 .
会计研究, 2018, (07) :57-63
[7]   从中国联通混合所有制改革看战略投资者的选择 [J].
张继德 ;
刘素含 .
会计研究, 2018, (07) :28-34
[8]   股权和控制权配置:从对等到非对等的逻辑——基于央属混合所有制上市公司的实证研究 [J].
刘汉民 ;
齐宇 ;
解晓晴 .
经济研究, 2018, 53 (05) :175-189
[9]   非国有股东治理与国企高管薪酬激励 [J].
蔡贵龙 ;
柳建华 ;
马新啸 .
管理世界, 2018, 34 (05) :137-149
[10]   控股股东委派执行董事能否提升公司治理水平 [J].
孙光国 ;
孙瑞琦 .
南开管理评论, 2018, 21 (01) :88-98+108