业绩期望差距与企业战略调整——基于中国上市公司的实证研究

被引:167
作者
连燕玲 [1 ]
贺小刚 [2 ,3 ]
高皓 [4 ]
机构
[1] 华东师范大学商学院
[2] 上海财经大学工商管理学院
[3] 上海财经大学浙江学院
[4] 清华大学五道口金融学院
关键词
业绩期望; 战略调整; 权力主体; 股东身份;
D O I
10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2014.11.012
中图分类号
F276.6 [公司]; F272 [企业计划与经营决策];
学科分类号
1202 ; 120202 ; 1201 ;
摘要
本文基于企业行为理论分析了业绩期望差距与战略调整之间的关系,并探讨了权力主体的特征,即控股股东身份、CEO个性和来源,以及所拥有的资源禀赋的调节作用。基于中国上市公司的数据,得到以下研究结论:(1)随着业绩期望落差的扩大,组织为解决困境和规避利益损失,实施战略调整的程度越大。(2)家族控股股东在业绩期望落差扩大时,因面临经济性和非经济性的损失更高,通过战略变革而规避损失的动机和需求更为强烈,实施战略调整的程度随之提高。(3)开放性和外部聘任的CEO拥有更高的决策能力和行为自由度,从而强化了在业绩期望落差状态下实施战略调整的程度。(4)权力主体所拥有的资源禀赋越多,意味着实施战略变革所需的基础条件越充足,进一步强化了在业绩期望落差扩大时的战略调整程度。本研究充分表明了期望水平与权力主体特征在战略调整过程中的重要性。
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 132+188 +188
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]  
Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance[J] . YanZhang,NandiniRajagopalan.Strat. Mgmt. J. . 2010 (3)
[12]   Determinants of firms' backward- and forward-looking R&D search behavior [J].
Chen, Wei-Ru .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (04) :609-622
[13]  
Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms[J] . Joseph P.H. Fan,T.J. Wong,Tianyu Zhang.Journal of Financial Economics . 2007 (2)
[14]   Aspiration performance and railroads′ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes [J].
Baum, Joel A. C. ;
Dahlin, Kristina B. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (03) :368-385
[15]  
Performance consequences of new CEO ‘Outsiderness’: Moderating effects of pre‐ and post‐succession contexts[J] . AyseKaraevli.Strat. Mgmt. J. . 2007 (7)
[16]  
Assessing Organizational Design and Performance. Williamson O E,Ouchi W. New York . 1981
[17]  
Managerial Discretion:A Bridge between Polar Views of Organizations. Hambrick D.C,Finkelstein S. Re-search in Organizational Behavior . 1987
[18]  
Investment and the Behavioral Theory of the Firm:Evidence from Shipbuilding. Greve,H.R. Industrial and Corporate Change . 2003
[19]  
Knowledge capability, strategic change, and firm performance: The moderating role of the environment[J] . Irene Goll,Nancy Brown Johnson,Abdul A. Rasheed.Management Decision . 2007 (2)
[20]  
A Contingency Theory of CEO Successor Choice and Post-bankruptcy Strategic Change[J] . Erich N. Brockmann,James J. Hoffman,David D. Dawley.Journal of Managerial Issues . 2006 (2)