碳交易的“能源-经济-环境”影响及碳价合理区间测算

被引:58
作者
孙睿
况丹
常冬勤
机构
[1] 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院
关键词
CGE模型; 碳交易; 能源消费; 碳减排; 情景分析;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F124 [经济建设和发展]; F205 [资源、环境和生态管理];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 120405 ; 020106 ;
摘要
The paper constructs a four nested CGE model containing a carbon trading module and the cost of carbon emissions in CES function of the production module,establishes Social Accounting Matrix( SAM) based on input-output table of China 2007,which is used to analyze and evaluate carbon pricing effects upon economic output,energy consumption and carbon abatement under different scenarios of emission reduction targets,estimates reasonable carbon price intervals,and finally concludes that:(1) At the macrolevel,higher carbon price causes more carbon abatement,more GDP loss,and less energy consumption. Considering the macroeconomic loss and emission effects,the paper identifies the optimal carbon price and reasonable carbon price intervals under different scenarios. It is most reasonable to introduce carbon market under the scenario of 10% carbon abatement target,which can accept heavier price shock(6. 9- 35 /tC) with less economic loss. Referring to decomposition factors of the Kaya equation,the carbon emission reduction effect caused by carbon price is mainly from the macro energy intensity effect and technical progress effect.Introducing carbon price will not only reduce energy consumption but induce a low-carbon energy consumption structure,especially the coal consumption decreased significantly.(2) At the industrial sector level,outputs of all sectors,especially energy sector,will drop,while industrial structure stays unchanged to some extent. The main impact on energy consumption is that the introduction of the carbon price has great effects on the energy sector and the transport sector. Each sector's unit cost of aggregated energy utilization is divided into two parts,the energy own price and cost of carbon emissions. The paper concludes that the unit cost of aggregated energy utilization's change is mainly caused by the cost of carbon emissions. Further,carbon emissions costs of energy intensive sectors are higher,while the reduction rate is relatively high,but the reduction effect is still not significant. The paper recomands implementing the incentive policy such as energy resources tax and transportation fuel tax which will maintain the necessary level of energy prices,and promoting emission reduction in the fields of coal and transportation.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 90
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   中国宏观社会核算矩阵的编制 [J].
范金 ;
杨中卫 ;
赵彤 .
世界经济文汇, 2010, (04) :103-119
[2]   中国构建碳交易市场的必要性及发展战略 [J].
于同申 ;
张欣潮 ;
马玉荣 .
社会科学辑刊, 2010, (02) :90-94
[3]   碳税与碳排放权交易对中国各行业的影响 [J].
张健 ;
廖胡 ;
梁钦锋 ;
周志杰 ;
于广锁 .
现代化工, 2009, 29 (06) :77-82
[4]   能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展 [J].
陈诗一 .
经济研究, 2009, 44 (04) :41-55
[5]   从国际比价看我国能源比价关系的合理性 [J].
卢晓燕 ;
郑厚清 ;
杨坤峰 .
中国能源, 2009, 31 (01) :39-42
[6]   碳税与碳排放 [J].
高鹏飞 ;
陈文颖 .
清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, (10) :1335-1338
[7]   中国排污权交易的可行性研究 [J].
杨展里 .
环境保护, 2001, (04) :31-33+46
[8]  
中国统计年鉴[M]. 中国统计出版社 , 中华人民共和国国家统计局, 2012
[9]  
Regulating CO 2 emissions of transportation in Europe: A CGE-analysis using market-based instruments[J] . Jan Abrell.Transportation Research Part D . 2010 (4)
[10]  
Environmental climate instruments in Romania: A comparative approach using dynamic CGE modelling[J] . Rodica Loisel.Energy Policy . 2009 (6)