金融危机冲击、管理者盈余动机与成本费用粘性研究

被引:52
作者
马永强
张泽南
机构
[1] 西南财经大学会计学院
关键词
成本费用粘性; 保盈动机; 产权性质; 金融危机;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F224 [经济数学方法]; F832.59 [金融危机]; F275 [企业财务管理];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070104 ; 1201 ; 020204 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
基于A BJ粘性扩展模型,本文在探讨管理者盈余动机对上市公司成本费用粘性影响基础上,考察了金融危机冲击对不同产权背景上市公司成本费用粘性的增强和消弱效应,同时检验了金融危机爆发后保盈动机是否会进一步诱发管理者对成本费用粘性进行干预。研究表明具有保盈动机的管理者会降低成本费用粘性,收入增加时小幅提升成本费用,收入下降时大幅降低成本费用;金融危机促使国有控股公司成本费用粘性增强,非国有控股公司成本费用粘性减弱;金融危机与保盈动机的双重驱动效应会削弱上市公司的成本费用粘性,并在金融危机爆发初期表现得更为充分。
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 80
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]  
A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons[J] . Kenneth Calleja,Michael Steliaros,Dylan C. Thomas.Management Accounting Research . 2006 (2)
[12]   Earnings management through real activities manipulation [J].
Roychowdhury, Sugata .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2006, 42 (03) :335-370
[13]   Predicting earnings using a model based on cost variability and cost stickiness [J].
Banker, RD ;
Chen, L .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2006, 81 (02) :285-307
[14]  
Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?[J] . Mark C.Anderson,Rajiv D.Banker,Surya N.Janakiraman.Journal of Accounting Research . 2003 (1)
[15]   Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses [J].
Burgstahler, D ;
Dichev, I .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1997, 24 (01) :99-126
[16]   ARE ADJUSTMENT COSTS FOR LABOR ASYMMETRIC - AN ECONOMETRIC TEST ON PANEL-DATA FOR ITALY [J].
JARAMILLO, F ;
SCHIANTARELLI, F ;
SEMBENELLI, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1993, 75 (04) :640-648
[17]  
Conditions under which activity-based cost systems provide relevant costs .2 Noreen,E. Journal of Management Accounting Research . 1991
[18]  
Cost Structure and Sticky Costs .2 Balakrishnan R,Labro,E,Soderstrom,N. . 2010