集聚与减排:城市规模差距影响工业污染强度的经验研究

被引：329

作者：

陆铭 ^{[1
,2
]}

冯皓 ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] 上海交通大学

[2] 复旦大学

[3] 匹兹堡大学经济学系

来源：

世界经济 | 2014年 / 37卷 / 07期

关键词：

经济集聚; 工业污染; 减排;

D O I：

10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2014.07.006

中图分类号：

X322 [部门环境规划与管理]; F299.2 [中国];

学科分类号：

083305 ; 1204 ;

摘要：

经济活动的空间集聚有利于减少单位GDP工业污染排放强度。本文构建了1993～2006年中国省级行政区内部地级市之间的人口规模差距,用来反映省级行政区内部的空间集聚水平。研究发现,人口和经济活动的集聚度提高有利于降低单位工业增加值的污染物质的排放强度。中国当前通过行政手段阻碍人口和经济活动向区域中心城市集聚的政策并不利于实现既定的减排目标。

引用

页码：86 / 114

页数：29

共 28 条

[11] Winter Heating or Clean Air? Unintended Impacts of China's Huai River Policy [J].

Almond, Douglas ;

Chen, Yuyu ;

Greenstone, Michael ;

Li, Hongbin .

AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (02) :184-190

[12]

The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption[J] . David Brownstone,Thomas F. Golob.Journal of Urban Economics . 2008 (1)

[13]

Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China[J] . Judith M. Dean,Mary E. Lovely,Hua Wang.Journal of Development Economics . 2008 (1)

[14]

Corruption, income and the environment: An empirical analysis[J] . Matthew A. Cole.Ecological Economics . 2006 (3)

[15]

Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey[J] . Soumyananda Dinda.Ecological Economics . 2004 (4)

[16]

Financial incentives and endogenous enforcement in China’s pollution levy system[J] . Hua Wang,David Wheeler.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management . 2004 (1)

[17]

Chapter 65 Spatial distribution of economic activities in Japan and China[J] . Masahisa Fujita.Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics . 2004

[18] The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve [J].

Stern, DI .

WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 32 (08) :1419-1439

[19]

The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of Manufactures[J] . Michael Greenstone.Journal of Political Economy . 2002 (6)

[20] The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve [J].

Andreoni, J ;

Levinson, A .

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 80 (02) :269-286

← 1 2 3 →