政府客观绩效、透明度与公民满意度

被引:23
作者
李文彬 [1 ]
何达基 [2 ]
机构
[1] 华南理工大学公共管理学院
[2] 美国堪萨斯大学公共事务管理学院
关键词
政府客观绩效; 透明度; 公民满意度;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D630 [国家机关工作与人事管理];
学科分类号
1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
对广东省治安、环保和就业的客观绩效数据和公民满意度数据的研究发现,公民满意度与客观绩效存在显著正相关关系。不过,该关系不但因政策领域而异,也会受到公民对政府透明度的主观感受和个人因素(如受教育水平)的影响。总体来说,政府透明度对客观绩效与公民满意度的关系产生正向调节作用。然而,当政府透明度高但信息不为公众所信任时,透明度则会产生逆向调节作用。
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 111+206 +206-207
页数:21
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]  
WHAT’S MEASURED IS WHAT MATTERS: TARGETS AND GAMING IN THE ENGLISH PUBLIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM[J] . GWYNBEVAN,CHRISTOPHERHOOD.Public Administration . 2006 (3)
[22]   The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government [J].
Tolbert, Caroline J. ;
Mossberger, Karen .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 (03) :354-369
[23]  
Models of Performance‐Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects[J] . JuliaMelkers,KatherineWilloughby.Public Administration Review . 2005 (2)
[24]  
Performance evaluation, public management improvement and democratic accountability[J] . Sonia Ospina,Nuria Cunill Grau,Ariel Zaltsman.Public Management Review . 2004 (2)
[25]  
Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services[J] . Gregg G.Van Ryzin.J. Pol. Anal. Manage. . 2004 (3)
[26]  
Implementing PBB: Conflicting Views of Success[J] . Katherine G.Willoughby,Julia E.Melkers.Public Budgeting & Finance . 2002 (1)
[27]   Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies [J].
Scott, SC ;
Goldberg, MS ;
Mayo, NE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (01) :45-55
[28]   REGRESSION-MODELS FOR ORDINAL DATA [J].
MCCULLAGH, P .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1980, 42 (02) :109-142