客户盈余公告对供应商具有传染效应吗?

被引:28
作者
王雄元 [1 ]
高曦 [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] 中南财经政法大学会计学院
[2] 云南财经大学会计学院
关键词
传染效应; 客户供应商关系; 盈余公告; 市场反应;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F274 [企业供销管理]; F275 [企业财务管理]; F832.51 [];
学科分类号
1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 020204 ;
摘要
本文探究了客户进行盈余公告后的市场反应对供应商是否具有传染效应,研究发现:客户公告盈余后,供应商股价的市场反应与客户股价的市场反应正相关,即客户盈余公告对价值链上的供应商具有纵向传染效应;客户盈余公告的纵向传染效应受到客户同行业横向传染效应的影响,且方向具有一致性,与同行业企业为协同关系时这种影响更大;相对于供应商同行业公司的盈余公告,供应商的投资者更关注其客户的盈余公告信息;营业收入、营业成本变动越大,未预期盈余越高,盈余持续性越强,客户盈余公告对供应商的传染效应越强;客户供应商关系越紧密,客户盈余公告对供应商的传染效应越强。
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 13+158 +158
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]  
Assessing financial contagion in the interbank market: Maximum entropy versus observed interbank lending patterns[J] . Paolo Emilio Mistrulli.Journal of Banking and Finance . 2010 (5)
[12]   Credit Contagion from Counterparty Risk [J].
Jorion, Philippe ;
Zhang, Gaiyan .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2009, 64 (05) :2053-2087
[13]   Positive and negative information transfers from management forecasts [J].
Kim, Yongtae ;
Lacina, Michael ;
Park, Myung Seok .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (04) :885-908
[14]  
Investor and Analyst Reactions to Earnings Announcements of Related Firms: An Empirical Analysis[J] . SundareshRamnath.Journal of Accounting Research . 2008 (5)
[15]  
Earnings volatility and earnings predictability[J] . Ilia D. Dichev,Vicki Wei Tang.Journal of Accounting and Economics . 2008 (1)
[16]   The contagion effects of accounting restatements [J].
Gleason, Cristi A. ;
Jenkins, Nicole Thorne ;
Johnson, W. Bruce .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2008, 83 (01) :83-110
[17]  
Inter-firm linkages and the wealth effects of financial distress along the supply chain[J] . Michael G. Hertzel,Zhi Li,Micah S. Officer,Kimberly J. Rodgers.Journal of Financial Economics . 2007 (2)
[18]  
Financial Networks: Contagion, Commitment, and Private Sector Bailouts[J] . YARON LEITNER.The Journal of Finance . 2005 (6)
[19]   Information and the cost of capital [J].
Easley, D ;
O'Hara, M .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2004, 59 (04) :1553-1583
[20]  
Buyer Structure and Seller Performance in U.S. Manufacturing Industries[J] . The Review of Economics and Statistics . 1991 (2)