CENTRAL SOURCES OF VISUAL MASKING - INDEXING STRUCTURES SUPPORTING SEEING AT A SINGLE, BRIEF GLANCE

被引:139
作者
MICHAELS, CF
TURVEY, MT
机构
[1] HASKINS LABS,270 CROWN ST,NEW HAVEN,CT 06510
[2] LAKE FOREST COLL,LAKE FOREST,IL 60045
[3] UNIV CONNECTICUT,STORRS,CT 06268
来源
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG | 1979年 / 41卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00309423
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When two briefly exposed, spatially overlapping visual fields are presented dichoptically, the identifiability of the first field is a J-shaped function of the interval separating their onsets. Three distinct sources of central masking are inferred from the selective influence of variables at different onset asynchronies. In integration through common synthesis, two fields presented at or near simultaneous onset yield one iconic representation. The distinctiveness of this source is inferred from the selective influence of eye dominance at and near simultaneous onset. At longer onset asynchronies, the selective influence of variables such as mask contrast and degree of contour overlap imply a second source of masking. This source was identified with the inhibition of sustained channels by transient channels reported elsewhere. Interchannel inhibition is proposed to affect the fidelity of the iconic representation, but here the imprecision is due to loss of form-relevant information on the first field. At yet longer onset asynchronies, where the fields are phenomenally separate, a third set of variables (e.g., words vs. nonwords and left vs. right visual fields) show their influence. These effects are taken as evidence of a replacement principle: the iconic representation of the second field directs attention from that of the first field. Here, first-field identifiability is constrained by time rather than by impoverished data. In a final series of experiments, central three-field interactions are demonstrated. A field, inserted into the temporal gap between two fields, is perceptually impaired even though it is separated from the first and third fields by intervals at which, individually, neither field is an effective mask. This second-field depression is accompanied by a first-field enhancement. The three sources of central masking are hard pressed to account for the three-field effects. © 1979 Springer-Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 61
页数:61
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1886, MIND, V11, P524
[2]   INTEGRATION AND INTERRUPTION IN MASKING OF FORM BY FORM [J].
BACHMANN, T ;
ALLIK, J .
PERCEPTION, 1976, 5 (01) :79-97
[3]   ANALYSIS OF WORD-SUPERIORITY EFFECT [J].
BARON, J ;
THURSTON, I .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 4 (02) :207-228
[4]   RECOVERY OF MASKED TARGETS [J].
BARRY, SH ;
DICK, AO .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1972, 12 (1B) :117-&
[5]   IMPLICATIONS OF SUSTAINED AND TRANSIENT CHANNELS FOR THEORIES OF VISUAL-PATTERN MASKING, SACCADIC SUPPRESSION, AND INFORMATION-PROCESSING [J].
BREITMEYER, BG ;
GANZ, L .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1976, 83 (01) :1-36
[6]  
Broadbent D. E., 1971, DECISION STRESS
[7]  
Cattell J, 1886, MIND, V11, P277
[8]   SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN WORD PERCEPTION [J].
CLAXTON, GL .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1975, 29 (04) :292-301
[9]   HEMISPHERIC DIFFERENCES IN SERIAL VERSUS PARALLEL PROCESSING [J].
COHEN, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 97 (03) :349-356
[10]  
COLTHEART M, 1972, NEW HORIZONS PSYCHOL, V2