ONCE-DAILY VERAPAMIL IN THE TREATMENT OF MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION - A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED DOSE-RANGING STUDY

被引:15
作者
CARR, AA
BOTTINI, PB
PRISANT, LM
FISHER, LD
DEVANE, JG
OBRIEN, DE
RHOADES, RB
机构
[1] MED PARAMETERS INC,AUGUSTA,GA
[2] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT MED STAT,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[3] ELAN PHARMACEUT RES CORP,GAINESVILLE,GA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/j.1552-4604.1991.tb03698.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Supine office blood pressures (SOBP) and 24-hour automated ambulatory blood pressure monitorings (AABPM) showed blood pressure reductions from a stable baseline to active treatment with 120-, 240-, and 480-mg doses of a new verapamil QD capsule (solid-spheroidal-oral once-daily drug-absorption system; (SODAS) in patients with mild-to-moderately severe (diastolic blood pressures 95-119 mm Hg) essential hypertension. Reductions were documented at 24 hours, hourly, and by the 24 hour average, using SOBP and AABPM, after the once-daily verapamil administration. Both SOBP and the 24-hour average by AABPM were significantly reduced from baseline by active verapamil treatment of 120-, 240-, and 480-mg doses. In comparison to verapamil QD (0 mg), blood pressure reductions from baseline to active treatment were significant at the 240- and 480-mg doses but not at the 120-mg dose. There was a significant linear dose response. This verapamil formulation (SODAS) was effective throughout the 24-hour period after once-daily dosing.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 150
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   HOW OFTEN IS MEDICATION TAKEN AS PRESCRIBED - A NOVEL ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE [J].
CRAMER, JA ;
MATTSON, RH ;
PREVEY, ML ;
SCHEYER, RD ;
OUELLETTE, VL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 261 (22) :3273-3277
[2]   A COMPARISON OF VERAPAMIL AND PROPRANOLOL FOR THE INITIAL TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION - RACIAL-DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE [J].
CUBEDDU, LX ;
ARANDA, J ;
SINGH, B ;
KLEIN, M ;
BRACHFELD, J ;
FREIS, E ;
ROMAN, J ;
EADES, T .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 256 (16) :2214-2221
[3]   ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AND ARTERIAL ANTICALCINOTIC EFFECTS OF CALCIUM-ANTAGONISTS [J].
FLECKENSTEIN, A ;
FREY, M ;
FLECKENSTEINGRUN, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1986, 57 (07) :D1-D10
[4]  
FRISHMAN WH, 1991, IN PRESS J CLIN PHAR
[5]  
Frolich E, 1988, HYPERTENSION, V11, p209A
[6]   CAN THE PROGRESSION OF CORONARY SCLEROSIS BE INFLUENCED BY CALCIUM-ANTAGONISTS [J].
KOBER, G ;
SCHNEIDER, W ;
KALTENBACH, M .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 13 :S2-S6
[7]  
LEONETTI G, 1981, CALCIUM ANTAGONISM C, P260
[8]  
LEWIS GRJ, 1978, NEW ZEAL MED J, V87, P351
[9]   RETARDATION OF ANGIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION OF CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE BY NIFEDIPINE - RESULTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL NIFEDIPINE TRIAL ON ANTIATHEROSCLEROTIC THERAPY (INTACT) [J].
LICHTLEN, PR ;
HUGENHOLTZ, PG ;
RAFFLENBEUL, W ;
HECKER, H ;
JOST, S ;
DECKERS, JW .
LANCET, 1990, 335 (8698) :1109-1113
[10]   COMPARISON OF NIFEDIPINE, PROPRANOLOL AND ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE ON ANGIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION AND REGRESSION OF CORONARY ARTERIAL NARROWINGS IN ANGINA-PECTORIS [J].
LOALDI, A ;
POLESE, A ;
MONTORSI, P ;
DECESARE, N ;
FABBIOCCHI, F ;
RAVAGNANI, P ;
GUAZZI, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 64 (08) :433-439