EFFECT OF TRAINING ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAXIMAL AND SUBMAXIMAL STRENGTH

被引:108
作者
BRAITH, RW [1 ]
GRAVES, JE [1 ]
LEGGETT, SH [1 ]
POLLOCK, ML [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV FLORIDA,COLL HLTH & HUMAN PERFORMANCE,GAINESVILLE,FL 32610
关键词
DYNAMIC STRENGTH; ONE REPETITION MAXIMUM; VARIABLE RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1249/00005768-199301000-00018
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of a dynamic seven to 10 repetition maximum (7-10 RM) test to estimate maximal knee extension strength (1-RM) in untrained and trained subjects. Thirty-three men and 25 women (25 +/- 5 yr) were randomly assigned to a group that trained two or three times. wk-1 for 18 wk (N = 47) or a control group (N = 11). Training included one set of 7-10 repetitions to volitional fatigue on a Nautilus(TM) knee extension machine. Prior to (T1) and after training (T2) dynamic strength was evaluated by 1-RM and 7-10 RM tests. The 7-10 RM test consisted of one set of variable resistance knee extension exercise performed to volitional fatigue with a weight that allowed 7-10 repetitions. The training group improved their 1-RM and 7-10 RM strength (by 31.7 and 51.4%, respectively) (P less-than-or-equal-to 0.01) while the control group did not change. Training increased relative 7-10 RM strength (68.4% of 1-RM at T1 and 79.1% of 1-RM at T2) (P less-than-or-equal-to 0.01). The relationship between the 7-10 RM weight and 1-RM at T1 was linear: 1-RM = 1.554 (7-10 RM weight) - 5.181; R2 = 0.89; SEE = 9.3 kg. Application of this equation following training resulted in a systematic overprediction (p less-than-or-equal-to 0.01) of 1-RM (21.2 kg) in trained subjects. Therefore, a second linear equation was developed to predict 1-RM in trained subjects: 1-RM = 1.172 (7-10 RM weight) + 7.704; R2 = 0.91; SEE= 9.9 kg. Our results indicate that a test consisting of 7-10 repetitions performed to exhaustion can accurately predict 1-RM knee extension strength. However, resistance training alters the relationship between maximal and submaximal strength, and thus the level of training is an important consideration when estimating 1-RM strength from a multiple repetition test performed to volitional fatigue.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 138
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC-STRENGTH AND STATIC-STRENGTH MODELS FOR PREDICTION OF LIFTING CAPACITY [J].
AGHAZADEH, F ;
AYOUB, MM .
ERGONOMICS, 1985, 28 (10) :1409-1417
[2]   EFFECTS OF AN ENDURANCE AND STRENGTH TRAINING-PROGRAM ON LIFTING CAPABILITY OF MALES [J].
ASFOUR, SS ;
AYOUB, MM ;
MITAL, A .
ERGONOMICS, 1984, 27 (04) :435-442
[3]   REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND COMPARISON OF MODELS FOR PREDICTING LIFTING CAPACITY [J].
AYOUB, MM ;
MITAL, A ;
ASFOUR, SS ;
BETHEA, NJ .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1980, 22 (03) :257-269
[4]  
BOHANNON RW, 1986, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V67, P390
[5]  
CHAFFIN DB, 1978, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V20, P403
[6]   SIMPLE METHOD FOR MEASUREMENT OF LOWER-EXTREMITY MUSCLE STRENGTH [J].
CSUKA, M ;
MCCARTY, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 78 (01) :77-81
[7]  
DELORME TL, 1945, J BONE JOINT SURG, V27, P645
[8]  
DEVRIES HA, 1986, PHYSL EXERCISE PHYSI, P608
[9]  
ERGEN E, 1983, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V23, P399
[10]  
FLECK SJ, 1987, DESIGNING RESISTANCE, P376