PHARMACOKINETIC DRUG-INTERACTIONS OF MACROLIDES

被引:294
作者
PERITI, P
MAZZEI, T
MINI, E
NOVELLI, A
机构
[1] Department of Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Florence
[2] Dipartimento di Farmacologia Preclinica E Clinica, Università Degli Studi, Firenze, 50134
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00003088-199223020-00004
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The macrolide antibiotics include natural members, prodrugs and semisynthetic derivatives. These drugs are indicated in a variety of infections and are often combined with other drug therapies, thus creating the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions. Macrolides can both inhibit drug metabolism in the liver by complex formation and inactivation of microsomal drug oxidising enzymes and also interfere with microorganisms of the enteric flora through their antibiotic effects. Over the past 20 years, a number of reports have incriminated macrolides as a potential source of clinically severe drug interactions. However, differences have been found between the various macrolides in this regard and not all macrolides are responsible for drug interactions. With the recent advent of many semisynthetic macrolide antibiotics it is now evident that they may be classified into 3 different groups in causing drug interactions. The first group (e.g. troleandomycin, erythromycins) are those prone to forming nitrosoalkanes and the consequent formation of inactive cytochrome P450-metabolite complexes. The second group (e.g. josamycin, flurithromycin, roxithromycin, clarithromycin, miocamycin and midecamycin) form complexes to a lesser extent and rarely produce drug interactions. The last group (e.g. spiramycin, rokitamycin, dirithromycin and azithromycin) do not inactivate cytochrome P450 and are unable to modify the pharmacokinetics of other compounds. It appears that 2 structural factors are important for a macrolide antibiotic to lead to the induction of cytochrome P450 and the formation in vivo or in vitro of an inhibitory cytochrome P450-iron-nitrosoalkane metabolite complex: the presence in the macrolide molecules of a non-hindered readily accessible N-dimethylamino group and the hydrophobic character of the drug. Troleandomycin ranks first as a potent inhibitor of microsomal liver enzymes, causing a significant decrease of the metabolism of methylprednisolone, theophylline, carbamazepine, phenazone (antipyrine) and triazolam. Troleandomycin can cause ergotism in patients receiving ergot alkaloids and cholestatic jaundice in those taking oral contraceptives. Erythromycin and its different prodrugs appear to be less potent inhibitors of drug metabolism. Case reports and controlled studies have, however, shown that erythromycins may interact with theophylline, carbamazepine, methylprednisolone, warfarin, cyclosporin, triazolam, midazolam, alfentanil, disopyramide and bromocriptine, decreasing drug clearance. The bioavailability of digoxin appears also to be increased by erythromycin in patients excreting high amounts of reduced digoxin metabolites, probably due to destruction of enteric flora responsible for the formation of these compounds. These incriminated macrolide antibiotics should not be administered concomitantly with other drugs known to be affected metabolically by them, or at the very least, combined administration should be carried out only with careful patient monitoring. Josamycin, midecamycin and probably also the related compounds miocamycin, clarithromycin and flurithromycin, may have a clinically significant interaction with carbamazepine and cyclosporin, requiring close monitoring. Roxithromycin interaction with drugs such as theophylline or cyclosporin does not seem to justify a dosage reduction. No pharmacokinetic interactions have yet been described for spiramycin, rokitamycin, dirithromycin and azithromycin.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 131
页数:26
相关论文
共 166 条
[1]  
ALBIN H, 1982, THERAPIE, V37, P151
[2]  
AOKI FY, 1987, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V41, P221
[3]   LOVASTATIN AND RHABDOMYOLYSIS [J].
AYANIAN, JZ ;
FUCHS, CS ;
STONE, RM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 109 (08) :682-683
[4]  
AZANZA J, 1990, J HEART TRANSPLANT, V9, P265
[5]  
AZRIA M, 1979, J PHARMACOL-PARIS, V10, P431
[6]   THE EFFECT OF ERYTHROMYCIN ON THE DISPOSITION KINETICS OF WARFARIN [J].
BACHMANN, K ;
SCHWARTZ, JI ;
FORNEY, R ;
FROGAMENI, A ;
JAUREGUI, LE .
PHARMACOLOGY, 1984, 28 (03) :171-176
[7]  
BACHMANN K, 1986, INT J CLIN PHARM TH, V24, P167
[8]   CHANGES IN THE STEADY-STATE PHARMACOKINETICS OF THEOPHYLLINE DURING TREATMENT WITH DIRITHROMYCIN [J].
BACHMANN, K ;
NUNLEE, M ;
MARTIN, M ;
SULLIVAN, T ;
JAUREGUI, L ;
DESANTE, K ;
SIDES, GD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 30 (11) :1001-1005
[9]  
BACHMANN K, 1984, RES COMMUNICATIONS C, V4, P207
[10]  
BACOURT F, 1978, NOUV PRESSE MED, V7, P1956