EFFICIENCY AND DISTRIBUTION IN GREENHOUSE NEGOTIATIONS

被引:28
作者
EYCKMANS, J [1 ]
PROOST, S [1 ]
SCHOKKAERT, E [1 ]
机构
[1] CATHOLIC UNIV LEUVEN,CTR ECON & ETH,B-3000 LOUVAIN,BELGIUM
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-6435.1993.tb00514.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyse the international aspects of the greenhouse problem. The equity versus efficiency trade-off is examined by reducing the set of instruments to the allocation of abatement efforts over countries without the possibility of side payments. The traditional cost-effective allocation of abatement efforts is no longer necessarily optimal. The trade-off is illustrated empirically by combining the available cost and benefit estimates in a simplified two-period model with 12 regions in the world. In a second application we follow an inverse optimum approach and compute the power weights implicit in actuel agreements.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 397
页数:35
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF REFORM AND INDIAN INDIRECT TAXES [J].
AHMAD, E ;
STERN, N .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1984, 25 (03) :259-298
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ENERG J
[3]   POWER AND TAXES [J].
AUMANN, RJ ;
KURZ, M .
ECONOMETRICA, 1977, 45 (05) :1137-1161
[4]  
Ayres R.U., 1991, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V1, P237, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF00367920, 10.1007/BF00367920]
[5]  
Barrett S, 1992, COMBATING GLOBAL WAR
[6]  
BARRETT S, 1991, PARADOX INT ENV AGRE
[7]  
BARRETT S, 1992, EUROPEAN EC
[8]  
BARRETT S, 1992, NEGOTIATING FRAMEWOR
[9]  
Barrett S., 1991, RESPONDING CLIMATE C
[10]  
Barrett Scott, 1992, CONFLICTS COOPERATIO