OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE

被引:148
作者
HAMMOND, SK
SORENSEN, G
YOUNGSTROM, R
OCKENE, JK
机构
[1] UNIV MASSACHUSETTS,SCH MED,DEPT FAMILY & COMMUNITY MED,WORCESTER,MA
[2] UNIV MASSACHUSETTS,SCH MED,DEPT BEHAV MED,WORCESTER,MA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1995年 / 274卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.274.12.956
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives.-To measure occupational exposures to environmental tobacco smoke in diverse settings, including offices and production areas, and to evaluate the effectiveness of policies that restrict or ban smoking in the workplace. Design.-Survey. The average weekly concentration of environmental tobacco smoke was measured with passive monitors that sample nicotine, Approximately 25 samplers were placed in each worksite for 1 week. Setting.-Twenty-five Massachusetts worksites, including fire stations, newspaper publishers, textile dyeing plants, and manufacturers of valves, fiberoptics, flight instruments, batteries, adhesives, semiconductor equipment, filters, and tools and dies. Samples were collected in offices and production areas. Main Outcome Measures.-The distribution of nicotine concentrations in various work settings as a function of company smoking policy. These data were interpreted with three approaches: comparing measured concentrations with a published risk assessment; comparing occupational exposures with home exposures; and evaluating the ''cigarette equivalents'' to which workers were exposed. Results.-Worksite smoking policy had a major effect on the nicotine concentrations, which fell from a median of 8.6 mu g/m(3) in the open offices at worksites that allowed smoking to 1.3 mu g/m(3) in sites that restricted smoking, and to 0.3 mu g/m(3) in worksites that banned smoking, The nonoffice workspaces were affected similarly, with median concentrations of 2.3, 0.7, and 0.2 mu g/m(3) at worksites that allowed, restricted, and banned smoking, respectively. Conclusion.-All three evaluation methods indicated that occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke presents a substantial risk to workers in the absence of a policy restricting or banning smoking.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 960
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
COUGHLIN J, 1989, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V130, P696
[2]   A PERSONAL MONITORING STUDY TO ASSESS WORKPLACE EXPOSURE TO ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE [J].
COULTAS, DB ;
SAMET, JM ;
MCCARTHY, JF ;
SPENGLER, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1990, 80 (08) :988-990
[3]   EXPOSURE TO ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE IN NATURALISTIC SETTINGS [J].
EMMONS, KM ;
ABRAMS, DB ;
MARSHALL, RJ ;
ETZEL, RA ;
NOVOTNY, TE ;
MARCUS, BH ;
KANE, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1992, 82 (01) :24-28
[4]   ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE AND LUNG-CANCER IN NONSMOKING WOMEN - A MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
FONTHAM, ETH ;
CORREA, P ;
REYNOLDS, P ;
WUWILLIAMS, A ;
BUFFLER, PA ;
GREENBERG, RS ;
CHEN, VW ;
ALTERMAN, T ;
BOYD, P ;
AUSTIN, DF ;
LIFF, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (22) :1752-1759
[5]   PASSIVE SMOKING AND HEART-DISEASE - EPIDEMIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND BIOCHEMISTRY [J].
GLANTZ, SA ;
PARMLEY, WW .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (01) :1-12
[6]  
GUERIN MR, 1992, CHEM ENV TOBACCO SMO, P151
[7]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE EXPOSURE AND CARCINOGEN HEMOGLOBIN ADDUCT LEVELS IN NONSMOKERS [J].
HAMMOND, SK ;
COGHLIN, J ;
GANN, PH ;
PAUL, M ;
TAGHIZADEH, K ;
SKIPPER, PL ;
TANNENBAUM, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (06) :474-478
[8]   COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF NICOTINE AS A MARKER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE [J].
HAMMOND, SK ;
LEADERER, BP ;
ROCHE, AC ;
SCHENKER, M .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1987, 21 (02) :457-462
[9]   A DIFFUSION MONITOR TO MEASURE EXPOSURE TO PASSIVE SMOKING [J].
HAMMOND, SK ;
LEADERER, BP .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 21 (05) :494-497
[10]  
HAMMOND SK, 1989, MEASUREMENT TOXIC RE, P590