UPSTREAM MONOPOLY, DOWNSTREAM COMPETITION AND SPATIAL PRICE-DISCRIMINATION

被引:29
作者
GUPTA, B
KATS, A
PAL, D
机构
[1] VIRGINIA POLYTECH INST & STATE UNIV,DEPT ECON,BLACKSBURG,VA 24061
[2] MIAMI UNIV,DEPT ECON,OXFORD,OH 45056
[3] UNIV CINCINNATI,DEPT ECON,CINCINNATI,OH 45221
关键词
UPSTREAM MONOPOLY; DOWNSTREAM SPATIAL COMPETITION; PRICE DISCRIMINATION;
D O I
10.1016/0166-0462(94)02054-X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Works on spatial competition with discriminatory pricing assume that the input market is competitive or, at least, that upstream input suppliers do not offer price schedules contingent on downstream location decisions. In the present paper it is assumed that an upstream monopoly sets the price of its output based on its observation of the locations chosen by the firms downstream. A complete characterization of a subgame-perfect equilibrium is given. In particular, no equilibrium is efficient. Furthermore, the payoffs of the different firms in an equilibrium, point to an incentive shared by all of them for vertical integration.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 542
页数:14
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   SPATIAL PRICE DISCRIMINATION, COMPETITION AND LOCATIONAL EFFECTS [J].
GREENHUT, JG ;
GREENHUT, ML .
ECONOMICA, 1975, 42 (168) :401-419
[2]   SEQUENTIAL ENTRY AND DETERRENCE WITH COMPETITIVE SPATIAL PRICE-DISCRIMINATION [J].
GUPTA, B .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1992, 38 (04) :487-490
[3]   DUOPOLY WITH SPATIAL AND QUANTITY-DEPENDENT PRICE-DISCRIMINATION [J].
HAMILTON, JH ;
THISSE, JF .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1992, 22 (02) :175-185
[4]   SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION - BERTRAND VS COURNOT IN A MODEL OF LOCATION CHOICE [J].
HAMILTON, JH ;
THISSE, JF ;
WESKAMP, A .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1989, 19 (01) :87-102
[6]  
HOLAHAN WL, 1975, AM ECON REV, V65, P498
[7]  
Hoover L., 1937, REV ECON STUD, V3, P182
[8]   SPATIAL DUOPOLY WITH DISCRIMINATORY PRICING [J].
HURTER, AP ;
LEDERER, PJ .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1985, 15 (04) :541-553
[10]   LOCATION-PRICE EQUILIBRIA IN A SPATIAL MODEL OF DISCRIMINATORY PRICING [J].
KATS, A .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1987, 25 (02) :105-109