THE HOW, WHY AND WHEN OF IMMUNOLOGICAL TESTING

被引:5
作者
DESCOTES, J [1 ]
VIAL, T [1 ]
VERDIER, F [1 ]
机构
[1] PHARMAKON EUROPE, ARBRESLE, FRANCE
来源
COMPARATIVE HAEMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL | 1993年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
IMMUNOTOXICITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; PRECLINICAL TESTING;
D O I
10.1007/BF00368107
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Immunotoxic effects include direct immunotoxicity, hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. Each effect requires a specific strategy to identify and assess the risks involved. At the moment, 2- or 3-tier protocols are considered the best modalities to detect an unexpectedly immunosuppressive compound and presumably an immunoenhancing compound as well. Such protocols are best conducted as 21-90 day rat studies. Contact sensitisation and anaphylaxis models in guinea pigs or mice are. also useful tools to predict hypersensitivity. Finally, only a few systemic autoimmune reactions may be predicted in mice or rats using the popliteal lymph node assay. Thanks to improved standardisation and interlaboratory validation, an increased risk for infections and lymphomas (immunosuppression), contact dermatitis, anaphylaxis (macromolecular compounds only) and systemic autoimmune reactions (e.g. lupus) can reasonably be predicted. As few guidelines are available concerning the immunotoxicity assessment of novel chemicals, it is proposed that tier-1 and contact sensitisation should be performed routinely whatever the compound whereas additional testing may be required on a case-by-case approach, taking into account the modalities of exposure (e.g. dose and duration), the exposed population and the nature of the compound (e.g. pharmaceuticals).
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 66
页数:4
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   SKIN SENSITIZATION - A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF PREDICTIVE TEST METHODS IN ANIMALS AND MAN [J].
BOTHAM, PA ;
BASKETTER, DA ;
MAURER, T ;
MUELLER, D ;
POTOKAR, M ;
BONTINCK, WJ .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1991, 29 (04) :275-286
[2]   ASSESSMENT OF IMMUNOBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS INDUCED BY CHEMICALS, DRUGS OR FOOD-ADDITIVES .1. TIER TESTING AND SCREENING APPROACH [J].
DEAN, JH ;
PADARATHSINGH, ML ;
JERRELLS, TR .
DRUG AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1979, 2 (1-2) :5-17
[3]  
DESCOTES J, 1986, Clinical Research Practices and Drug Regulatory Affairs, V4, P75, DOI 10.3109/10601338609032957
[4]   IDENTIFICATION OF CONTACT ALLERGENS - THE MOUSE EAR SENSITIZATION ASSAY [J].
DESCOTES, J .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY-CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 1988, 7 (04) :263-272
[5]  
DESCOTES J, 1988, IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY DRU
[6]  
DESCOTES J, 1993, IN PRESS MODERN METH
[7]  
Descotes J., 1990, DRUG INDUCED IMMUNE
[8]   DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE DERMAL SENSITIZATION TEST - THE MOUSE EAR SWELLING TEST (MEST) [J].
GAD, SC ;
DUNN, BJ ;
DOBBS, DW ;
REILLY, C ;
WALSH, RD .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 1986, 84 (01) :93-114
[9]   TESTING GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION OF THE IMMUNOTOXIC POTENTIAL OF DIRECT FOOD-ADDITIVES [J].
HINTON, DM .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 1992, 32 (02) :173-190
[10]  
KAMMULLER ME, 1989, AUTOIMMUNITY TOXICOL