RECURSIVE AND SEQUENTIAL-TESTS OF THE UNIT-ROOT AND TREND-BREAK HYPOTHESES - THEORY AND INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE

被引:541
作者
BANERJEE, A
LUMSDAINE, RL
STOCK, JH
机构
[1] PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT ECON,PRINCETON,NJ 08544
[2] HARVARD UNIV,JOHN F KENNEDY SCH GOVT,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02138
关键词
CHANGEPOINT; DICKEY-FULLER TESTS; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.2307/1391542
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article investigates the possibility, raised by Perron and by Rappoport and Reichlin, that aggregate economic time series can be characterized as being stationary around broken trend lines. Unlike those authors, we treat the break date as unknown a priori. Asymptotic distributions are developed for recursive, rolling, and sequential tests for unit roots and/or changing coefficients in time series regressions. The recursive and rolling tests are based on changing sub-samples of the data. The sequential statistics are computed using the full data set and a sequence of regressors indexed -by a "break" date. When applied to data on real postwar output from seven Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries, these techniques fail to reject the unit-root hypothesis for five countries (including the United States) but suggest stationarity around a shifted trend for Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 287
页数:17
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   A TEST OF GOODNESS OF FIT [J].
ANDERSON, TW ;
DARLING, DA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1954, 49 (268) :765-769
[2]  
ANDREWS DWK, 1989, UNPUB TESTS PARAMETE
[3]  
BAI J, 1991, UNPUB TESTING DATING
[4]  
BANERJEE A, 1990, UNPUB RECURSIVE TEST
[5]  
BANERJEE A, 1990, 3510 NAT BUR EC RES
[6]  
BATES CE, 1990, UNPUB STRUCTURAL STA
[7]   ON THE THEORY OF TESTING FOR UNIT ROOTS IN OBSERVED TIME-SERIES [J].
BHARGAVA, A .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1986, 53 (03) :369-384
[8]  
Blanchard O. J., 1986, AM BUSINESS CYCLE CO, P123, DOI DOI 10.3386/W1392
[9]  
BROWN RL, 1975, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V37, P149
[10]   INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE ON THE PERSISTENCE OF ECONOMIC-FLUCTUATIONS [J].
CAMPBELL, JY ;
MANKIW, NG .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1989, 23 (02) :319-333