Output and abatement effects of allocation readjustment in permit trade

被引:3
作者
Thomas Sterner
Adrian Muller
机构
[1] Göteborg University,Environmental Economics Unit (EEU), Department of Economics
[2] University Fellow,Center for Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability (CCRS)
[3] Resources for the Future (RFF),undefined
[4] University of Zürich,undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2008年 / 86卷
关键词
Allocation Scheme; Trading Scheme; Permit Price; Initial Allocation; Commitment Period;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In permit trading systems, free initial allocation is common practice. A recent example is the European Union Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Scheme (EU-ETS). We investigate effects of different free allocation schemes on incentives and identify significant perverse effects on abatement and output employing a simple multi-period model. Firms have incentives for strategic action if allocation in one period depends on their actions in previous ones and thus can be influenced by them. These findings play a major role where trading schemes become increasingly popular as environmental or resource use policy instruments. This is of particular relevance in the EU-ETS where the current period is a trial-period before the first commitment period of the Kyoto protocol. Finally, this paper fills a gap in the literature by establishing a consistent terminology for initial allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 49
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Åhman M(2007)A ten-year rule to guide the allocation of EU emission allowances energy policy Energy Policy 35 1718-1730
[2]  
Burtraw D(2002)Rent-seeking and quota regulation of a renewable resource Resour Energy Econ 24 263-279
[3]  
Kruger J(2002)The effect on asset values of the allocation of carbon dioxide emission allowances Electr J 15 51-62
[4]  
Zetterberg L(2006)CO Electr J 19 79-90
[5]  
Bergland H(2001) allowance allocation in the regional greenhouse gas initiative and the effect on electricity investors Land Econ 77 513-526
[6]  
Clark DJ(2003)Emissions trading: ERCs or allowances? Climate Policy 3S2 S89-S109
[7]  
Perdersen PA(2005)Combining rate-based and cap-and-trade emissions policies Econ Lett 87 113-119
[8]  
Burtraw D(2002)The political economy of refunded emissions payments programs Rev Econ Des 7 45-56
[9]  
Palmer K(2004)How to get firms to invest: a simple solution to the hold-up problem in regulation J Public Econ 88 713-725
[10]  
Bharvirkar R(1999)Emission taxes and optimal refunding schemes J Public Econ 72 275-288