Image events, the public sphere, and argumentative practice: The case of radical environmental groups

被引:8
作者
John W. Delicath
Kevin Michael DeLuca
机构
[1] Department of Communication, Center for Environmental Communication Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati
[2] Department of Speech Communication, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens
关键词
Controversy; Image events; Oppositional argument; Postmodern public communication; Public sphere; Radical ecology groups; Visual argumentation;
D O I
10.1023/A:1025179019397
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Operating from the assumption that a primary dynamic of contemporary public argument involves the use of visual images the authors explore the argumentative possibilities of the 'image events' (staged protests designed for media dissemination) employed by radical ecology groups. In contextualizing their discussion, the authors offer an analysis of the contemporary conditions for argumentation by describing the character and operation of public communication, social problem creation, and public opinion formation in a massmediated public sphere. The authors argue that image events are a form of postmodern argumentative practice, a kind of oppositional argument that creates social controversy, and animates and widens possibilities for debate. They further suggest that image events are a postmodern form of argument involving acts of protest which deliver images as argumentative fragments. Employing the tools of traditional argument theory the authors describe how images are capable of offering unstated propositions and advancing indirect and incomplete claims in ways that function to block enthymemes and advance alternatives. In concluding, the authors discuss the implications of image events for our understanding of the public sphere and the possibilities for argumentation in a postmodern age. © 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 333
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aden R.C., The Enthymeme as Postmodern Argument Form: Condensed Mediated Argument Then and Now, Argumentation and Advocacy, 31, pp. 54-63, (1994)
[2]  
Barbatsis G.S., Look and I Will Show You Something You Will Want to See': Pictoral Engagement in Negative Political Campaign Commercials, Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, pp. 69-80, (1996)
[3]  
Bennett W.L., White Noise: The Perils of Mass Mediated Democracy, Communication Monographs, 59, pp. 397-400, (1992)
[4]  
Biesecker B., Michel Foucault and the Question of Rhetoric, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 25, pp. 351-364, (1992)
[5]  
Blair J.A., The Possibility and Actuality of Visual Argument, Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, pp. 23-39, (1996)
[6]  
Cassidy S., The Environment and the Media: Two Strategies for Challenging Hegemony, Democratic Communications in the Information Age, (1992)
[7]  
Chase K.R., The Challenge of Avant-garde Argument, Argumentation and Advocacy, 29, pp. 16-31, (1992)
[8]  
DeLuca K.M., Constituting Nature Anew Through Judgment: The Possibilities of the Media, Earthtalk: Communication Empowerment for Environmental Action, (1996)
[9]  
DeLuca K.M., Meditations on Image Events: The Possibilities and Consequences for Rhetorical Theory, (1996)
[10]  
DeLuca K.M., Image Politics: The New Rhetoric of Environmental Activism, (1999)