Do Academic Spin-Outs Differ and Does it Matter?

被引:9
作者
Céline Druilhe
Elizabeth Garnsey
机构
[1] University of Cambridge,Centre for Business Research
[2] Judge Institute of Management,Institute for Manufacturing
[3] University of Cambridge,undefined
关键词
Economic Growth; Business Model; Main Type; Policy Implication; Industrial Organization;
D O I
10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034123.26133.97
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper questions the widespread tendency to view academic spin-outs as an undifferentiated category and explores typologies of companies originating in universities, using a Penrosean conceptualization of entrepreneurial activity. We initially identified five main types of business activities pursued by academic entrepreneurs, which we revised after analyzing a database of Cambridge University spin-outs and real-time exemplars of emerging ventures. The refined typology takes into account the dynamic of the entrepreneurial process. As the business models of ventures evolve they may enter a different category of business activity. We conclude by discussing the academic and practical needs for a better understanding of the heterogeneity of spin-outs, the diversity of which has theoretical and policy implications.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 285
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Autio E.(1997)New, Technology-Based Firms in Innovation Networks: Symplectic and Generative Impacts Research Policy 26 263-281
[2]  
Barney J.(1991)Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage Journal of Management 17 99-120
[3]  
Brush C.G.(2001)From Initial Idea to Unique Advantage: The Entrepreneurial Challenge of Constructing a Resource Base Academy of Management Review 15 64-78
[4]  
Greene P.G.(2003)Why Do Some Universities Generate More Start-Ups than Others? Research Policy 32 209-227
[5]  
Hart M.M.(1998)A Theory of the Early Growth of the Firm Industrial and Corporate Change 7 523-556
[6]  
Di Gregorio D.(1998)Proximity and Complexity in the Emergence of High Technology Industry: The Oxbridge Comparison Geoforum 29 433-450
[7]  
Shane S.(1993)Pre-Competitive and Near-Market Research and Development: Problems for Policy International Journal of Technology Management 8 69-83
[8]  
Garnsey E.W.(1991)The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation California Management Review 33 119-135
[9]  
Garnsey E.W.(2003)Technology Transfer and Universities' Spin-Out Strategies Small Business Economics 20 185-200
[10]  
Lawton Smith H.(1997)Spin-Off Enterprises: How French Academics Create Hi-Tech Companies: The Conditions for Success and Failure Science and Public Policy 24 37-43