Artifact dualism, materiality, and the hard problem of ontology: Some critical remarks on the dual nature of technical artifacts program

被引:1
作者
Vaccari A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie University, Sydney
关键词
Dual nature theory; Intentionalism; Materiality; Ontology of artifacts; Ontology of systems;
D O I
10.1007/s13347-011-0059-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper critically examines the forays into metaphysics of The Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts Program (henceforth, DNP). I argue that the work of DNP is a valuable contribution to the epistemology of certain aspects of artifact design and use, but that it fails to advance a persuasive metaphysic. A central problem is that DNP approaches ontology from within a functionalist framework that is mainly concerned with ascriptions and justified beliefs. Thus, the materiality of artifacts emerges only as the external conditions of realizability of function ascription. The work of DNP has a strong programmatic aspect and much of its foray into metaphysics is tentative, so the intent of my argument is partly synthetic: to sum up these issues as they are presented in the literature and highlight some recognized problems. But I also go beyond that, suggesting that these problems are foundational, arising from the very way in which DNP poses the question of artifact metaphysics. Although it sets out to incorporate objective aspects of technology, DNP places a strong focus on the intentional side of the purported matter-mind duality, bracketing off materiality in an irretrievable manner. Thus, some of the advantages of dualism are lost. I claim that DNP is dualistic, not merely based on "duality", but that its version of dualism does not appropriately account for the material "nature" of artifacts. The paper ends by suggesting some correctives and alternatives to Dual Nature theory. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 29
页数:22
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Arthur, B., Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events (1989) The Economic Journal, 99, pp. 116-131. , 10.2307/2234208
[2]  
Arthur, B., (2009) The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves, , The Free Press Washington
[3]  
Baker, L.R., Unity without identity: A new look at material constitution (1999) Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 23, pp. 144-165. , 10.1111/1475-4975.00008
[4]  
Baker, L.R., The ontology of artifacts (2004) Philosophical Explorations, 7 (2), pp. 99-111. , 10.1080/13869790410001694462
[5]  
Baker, L.R., On the twofold nature of artifacts (2006) Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, pp. 132-136. , 10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.12.014
[6]  
Barnet, B., Eldredge, N., Material cultural evolution: An interview with Niles Eldredge (2004) Fibreculture 3, , http://three.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-017-material-cultural-evolution- an-interview-with-niles-eldredge/, Accessed on 11th November 2007
[7]  
Burry, M., Homo faber (2005) Architectural Design, 75 (4), pp. 30-37. , 10.1002/ad.100
[8]  
Carrara, M., Vermaas, P., The fine-grained metaphysics of artifactual and biological functional kinds (2009) Synthese, 169, pp. 125-143. , 10.1007/s11229-008-9339-1
[9]  
David, P., Clio and the economics of QWERTY (1985) American Economic Review, 75, pp. 332-337
[10]  
De Vries, M.J., Duality or dualism? A reply to Johan Stellingwerff (2005) Philosophia Reformata, 70, pp. 64-69