Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer's dilemma

被引:491
作者
Chellappa R.K. [1 ]
Sin R.G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Information and Operations Management, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
关键词
Online transactions; Personalization; Privacy; SEM; Trust;
D O I
10.1007/s10799-005-5879-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Personalization refers to the tailoring of products and purchase experience to the tastes of individual consumers based upon their personal and preference information. Recent advances in information acquisition and processing technologies have allowed online vendors to offer varieties of web-based personalization that not only increases switching costs, but also serves as important means of acquiring valuable customer information. However, investments in online personalization may be severely undermined if consumers do not use these services due to privacy concerns. In the absence of any empirical evidence that seeks to understand this consumer dilemma, our research develops a parsimonious model to predict consumers' usage of online personalization as a result of the tradeoff between their value for personalization and concern for privacy. In addition to this tradeoff, we find that a consumer's intent to use personalization services is positively influenced by her trust in the vendor. Our findings suggest that: 1. online vendors can improve their abilities to acquire and use customer information through trust building activities; 2. it is of critical importance that vendors understand and evaluate the different values consumers may place in enjoying various types of personalization. © Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 202
页数:21
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Alba J., Et al., Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces, Journal of Marketing, 61, pp. 38-53, (1997)
[2]  
Anderson J.C., Gerbing D.W., Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, pp. 411-423, (1988)
[3]  
Bagozzi R.P., Philips L.W., Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 3, pp. 459-489, (1982)
[4]  
Benassi P., TRUSTe: An online privacy seal program, Communications of the ACM, 42, 2, (1999)
[5]  
Blattberg R.C., Deighton J., Interactive marketing: Exploiting the age of addressability, Sloan Management Review Fall, pp. 5-14, (1991)
[6]  
Blau P., Exchange and Power in Social Life, (1964)
[7]  
Bruno L., Certificate authorities: Who do you trust?, Data Communications, 27, 4, pp. 54-63, (1998)
[8]  
Byrne B., Structural Equation Modeling With LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS, (1998)
[9]  
Chellappa R.K., Contrasting expert assessment of privacy with perceived privacy: Implications for public policy, pp. 147-154, (2001)
[10]  
Chin W.W., Todd P.A., On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution, MIS Quarterly, 19, 2, pp. 237-246, (1995)