The European Legislation on AI: a Brief Analysis of its Philosophical Approach

被引:56
作者
Luciano Floridi
机构
[1] University of Oxford,Oxford Internet Institute
[2] The Alan Turing Institute,undefined
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s13347-021-00460-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 222
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Barrett C(2019)Are the EU GDPR and the California CCPA becoming the de facto global standards for data privacy and protection? Scitech Lawyer 15 24-29
[2]  
Cath C(2018)Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: The US, EU, and UK approach Science and Engineering Ethics 24 505-528
[3]  
Wachter S(2019)Digital constitutionalism: A new systematic theorisation’ (2019) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 33 76-99
[4]  
Mittelstadt B(2021)The rise of digital constitutionalism in the European Union International Journal of Constitutional Law 28 329-332
[5]  
Taddeo M(2015)The new grey power Philosophy & Technology 1 261-262
[6]  
Floridi L(2019)Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI Nature Machine Intelligence 32 185-193
[7]  
Celeste E(2019)Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: Five risks of being unethical Philosophy & Technology 33 369-378
[8]  
De Gregorio Giovanni(2020)The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU Philosophy & Technology 28 689-707
[9]  
Floridi L(2018)AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI Society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations Minds and Machines 557 309-309
[10]  
Floridi L(2018)Romans would have denied robots legal personhood Nature 36 59-77