New rating methods to prioritize customer requirements in QFD with incomplete customer preferences

被引:4
作者
Yoon-Eui Nahm
Haruo Ishikawa
Masato Inoue
机构
[1] Hanbat National University,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] The University of Electro-Communications (UEC Tokyo),Department of Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Systems
[3] Meiji University,Department of Mechanical Engineering Informatics
来源
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | 2013年 / 65卷
关键词
Quality function deployment; Customer needs or requirements; Customer preference; Customer satisfaction; Importance ratings or priorities;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Customer satisfaction is one of the critical success factors to many leading companies over the world. Quality function deployment (QFD) has gained extensive international support as one of the powerful techniques to increase the customer satisfaction. In the QFD, correctly rating the final importance of customer requirements (CRs) is a crucial and essential process since it largely affects the target value setting of design requirements. The final importance ratings of CRs are generally determined by combining relative importance ratings and competitive priority ratings. However, determining the final importance ratings is very difficult due to the typical uncertainty or imprecision of customer’s judgment (or perceptions). This paper proposes a novel approach to prioritize CRs in QFD process by developing two sets of new rating methods, called customer preference rating (CPR) method and customer satisfaction rating (CSR) method, for relative importance ratings and competitive priority ratings, respectively. The CPR method provides a simple and intuitive technique to capture the customers’ incomplete or uncertain perceptions on the relative importance of CRs based on their own preferences, allowing them to give a partial ordering of CRs. The CSR method constructs the customer satisfaction model based on the competitive benchmarking analysis and then evaluates the performance quality of company product using our satisfaction and uncertainty measure. Furthermore, the CSR method is integrated with the Kano’s model to capture the different impacts of CRs on customer satisfaction. Finally, the proposed approach is illustrated with a numerical example of car door design problem.
引用
收藏
页码:1587 / 1604
页数:17
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Cristiano JJ(2001)Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD) IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48 81-95
[2]  
Liker JK(1998)How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment Technovation 18 25-38
[3]  
White CC(2008)Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design Int J Prod Econ 114 667-681
[4]  
Matzler K(2003)Modeling of quality function deployment planning with resource allocation Res Eng Des 14 247-255
[5]  
Hinterhuber HH(1995)QFD: the problem of comparing technical/engineering design requirements Res Eng Des 7 270-278
[6]  
Chen CC(2010)Integrating customer’s preferences in the QFD planning using a combined benchmarking and imprecise goal programming model Int Trans Oper Res 17 85-102
[7]  
Chuang MC(1988)The house of quality Harv Bus Rev 66 63-73
[8]  
Fung RYK(1993)The voice of customer Mark Sci 12 1-27
[9]  
Yiliu TP(1999)Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods Int J Prod Res 37 2499-2518
[10]  
Chen Y(2009)An integrated method of rough set, Kano’s model and AHP for rating customer requirements’ final importance Expert Syst Appl 36 7045-7053