Governmentality and the war on terror: FBI project carnivore and the diffusion of disciplinary power

被引:1
作者
Ventura H.E. [1 ]
Miller J.M. [1 ]
Deflem M. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of South Carolina,
关键词
Social Control; Central Processing Unit; Federal Bureau; Surveillance Method; Control Literature;
D O I
10.1007/s10612-004-6167-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Social control capabilities have increased significantly over the past several decades, particularly because of an increased utilization of technologically advanced surveillance methods. Following the tragic events of September 11,2001, U.S. Congress and the present Administration have granted law enforcement considerable new powers in the enforcement and prevention of terrorism-related crime. Collectively labeled under the heading of the so-called ''war on terror'' , the scope of such laws, policies and directives are challenged by civil rights organizations and numerous legislators for lack of definitional precision, arbitrary application of sanctions, and violation of privacy laws. One of federal law enforcement's surveillance tools is ''Project Carnivore,'' a Justice Department Internet surveillance program that is administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to access information flowing to and from a central processing unit on a network connection. While, theoretically relying on Michel Foucault's theory of discipline and governmentality, as well as related insights in the social control literature, this paper examines Project Carnivore relative to the larger context of state rationality and related privacy issues. © Springer 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 70
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Insatiable Appetite: the Government's Demand for New and Unnecessary Powers after September 11, (2002)
[2]  
The ACLU in the Courts since 9/11, (2003)
[3]  
Baddeley S., Govemmentality, The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology and Global Restructuring, pp. 64-96, (1997)
[4]  
Birdis T., Justice Department asks Congress to clear wide-ranging antiterrorism legislation, The Wall Street Journal, (2001)
[5]  
Black D., The Behavior of Law, (1976)
[6]  
Black D., The Social Structure of Right and Wrong, (1993)
[7]  
Cohen S., Visions of Social Control, (1985)
[8]  
Collingwood J.E., Editorial Responses, 24 July, (2000)
[9]  
Collingwood J.E., Editorial Responses, 25 July, (2000)
[10]  
Collingwood J.E., Editorial Responses, 7 August, (2000)