Assessing interbank contagion using simulated networks

被引:85
作者
Hałaj G. [1 ]
Kok C. [1 ]
机构
[1] European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29
关键词
Banking; Interbank contagion; Network theory; Stress-testing; Systemic risk;
D O I
10.1007/s10287-013-0168-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a new approach to randomly generate interbank networks while overcoming shortcomings in the availability of bank-by-bank bilateral exposures. Our model can be used to simulate and assess interbank contagion effects on banking sector soundness and resilience. We find a strongly non-linear pattern across the distribution of simulated networks, whereby only for a small percentage of networks the impact of interbank contagion will substantially reducoe average solvency of the system. In the vast majority of the simulated networks the system-wide contagion effects are largely negligible. The approach furthermore enables to form a view about the most systemic banks in the system in terms of the banks whose failure would have the most detrimental contagion effects on the system as a whole. Finally, as the simulation of the network structures is computationally very costly, we also propose a simplified measure-a so-called Systemic Probability Index-that also captures the likelihood of contagion from the failure of a given bank to honour its interbank payment obligations but at the same time is less costly to compute. We find that the SPI is broadly consistent with the results from the simulated network structures. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 186
页数:29
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Adrian, T., Brunnermeier, M., (2011) CoVaR, , Working Paper 17454, NBER
[2]  
Adrian, T., Shin, H.S., Financial intermediaries and monetary economics (2010) Handbook of Monetary Economics, , B. Friedman and M. Woodford (Eds.), New York: North-Holland
[3]  
Aharony, J., Swary, V., Contagion effects of bank failures: evidence from capital markets (1983) J Bus, 56 (3), pp. 305-317
[4]  
Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabási, A.-L., Error and attach tolerance of complex networks (2000) Nature, 406, pp. 378-382
[5]  
Allen, F., Babus, A., Networks in finance (2009) The Network Challenge: Strategy, Profit, and Risk in an Interlinked World, , P. Kleindorfer and J. Wind (Eds.), Philadelphia: Wharton School Publishing
[6]  
Allen, F., Gale, D., Financial contagion (2000) J Polit Econ, 108 (1), pp. 1-33
[7]  
Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R., Emergence of scaling in random networks (1999) Science, 268, pp. 509-512
[8]  
Battiston, S., Gatti, D., Gallegat, M., Greenwald, B., Stiglitz, J., Liaisons dangereuses: increasing connectivity, risk sharing, and systemic risk (2012) J Econ Dyn Control, 36 (8), pp. 1121-1141
[9]  
Battiston, S., Delli Gatti, D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B., Stiglitz, J.E., Default cascades: when does risk diversification increase stability? (2012) J Financial Stab, 8 (3), pp. 138-149
[10]  
Bhattacharya, S., Gale, D., Preference shocks, liquidity and central bank policy (1987) New Approaches to Monetary Economics, , W. Barnett and K. Singleton (Eds.), New York: Cambridge University Press