Information technologies and the tragedy of the Good Will

被引:13
作者
Luciano Floridi
机构
[1] Università degli Studi di Bari,Dipartimento di Scienze Filosofiche
[2] Oxford University,Faculty of Philosophy and IEG, Computing Laboratory
关键词
agents; evil; globalization; Good Will; information ethics; tragedy of the Good Will;
D O I
10.1007/s10676-006-9110-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Information plays a major role in any moral action. ICT (Information and Communication Technologies) have revolutionized the life of information, from its production and management to its consumption, thus deeply affecting our moral lives. Amid the many issues they have raised, a very serious one, discussed in this paper, is labelled the tragedy of the Good Will. This is represented by the increasing pressure that ICT and their deluge of information are putting on any agent who would like to act morally, when informed about actual or potential evils, but who also lacks the resources to do much about them. In the paper, it is argued that the tragedy may be at least mitigated, if not solved, by seeking to re-establish some equilibrium, through ICT themselves, between what agents know about the world and what they can do to improve it.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 262
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Floridi L.(1999)Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundations of Computer Ethics Ethics and Information Technology 1 37-56
[2]  
Floridi L.(2002)Information Ethics: An Environmental Approach to the Digital Divide Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 39-45
[3]  
Floridi L.(2001)Artificial Evil and the Foundation of Computer Ethics Ethics and Information Technology 3 55-66
[4]  
Sanders J.(2002)Mapping the Foundationalist Debate in Computer Ethics Ethics and Information Technology 4 1-9
[5]  
Floridi L.(1996)Unique Ethical Problems in Information Technology Science and Engineering Ethics 2 137-154
[6]  
Sanders J.(2006)The Logic of Knowledge Based Obligation Synthese 149 57-87
[7]  
Maner W.(2002)The Uniqueness Debate in Computer Ethics: What Exactly Is at Issue, and Why Does It Matter? Ethics and Information Technology 4 37-54
[8]  
Pacuit E.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Parikh R.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Cogan E.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined